The mathemagician had a brilliant idea, but unfortunately he made an algebraic mistake:
He wrote:
"Thus, also, lim n->∞ (1 + 1/n^(4/3))^(n^(4/3)) = e.
Taking the 3/4 root gives lim n->∞ (1 + 1/n^(4/3))^n = e^(3/4)."
This is a mistake, because (1 + 1/n^(4/3))^(n^(4/3)) IS NOT [(1 + 1/n^(4/3))^(n)](4/3). So, taking the 3/4 root does not lead to his conclusion. Just an algebraic mistake that anyone can make.
Actually, the series diverges. To see this, observe that, according to Taylor expansion, for every a>1 and every real x we have
a^x = 1 + x ln(a) + x^2/2 (ln(a))^2 ...+ x^n/n! (ln(a))^n....
Thefore, for x>0 we have a^x > 1 + x ln(a) => a^(1/x) > 1 + ln(a)/x. In particular, it follows that, for every integer n >=1, we have
2^(1/n) > 1 + ln(2)/n => 2^(1/n) -1 > ln(2)/n
Sum (ln(2)/n diverges, because the harmonic series Sum 1/n diverges. By comparisson, we conclude Sum (2^(1/n) -1) diverges.
2007-04-19 09:48:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Steiner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
EDIT: The answerer after me is correct; I made a mistake in my solution. The series diverges. Please refer to his solution instead.
---
This is a tough one (unless I'm missing something). The series converges.
Use direct comparison with 1/n^(4/3).
Recall that lim n->â (1 + 1/n)^n = e.
Thus, also, lim n->â (1 + 1/n^(4/3))^(n^(4/3)) = e.
Taking the 3/4 root gives lim n->â (1 + 1/n^(4/3))^n = e^(3/4).
Since e^(3/4) > 2, then in particular, for large values of n, we have
(1 + 1/n^(4/3))^n > 2
Take the nth root:
1 + 1/n^(4/3) > 2^(1/n)
Subtract 1:
1/n^(4/3) > 2^(1/n) - 1.
Since 0 < 2^(1/n) - 1 < 1/n^(4/3) for large values of n, and â1/n^(4/3) converges, then â(2^(1/n) - 1) converges as well.
2007-04-19 02:34:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
just because lim n=>oo gives 0 does not mean converges
Ratio Test:
lim n=>oo I 2^(1/(n+1)) -1 divide by 2^(1/n) -1 I
Use L'Hopital's Rule
lim n=>oo I 2^(1/(n+1)) *(-1/(n+1)^2) divide by 2^(1/n) * (-1/n^2)
lim n=>oo I 2^ (1/n+1 - 1/n) * n^2 / (n+1)^2 I
evaluate limit 2^0 = 1
INCONCLUSIVE.. DARN!
2007-04-19 02:01:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This should DIVERGE, since after a while, the 2^(1/n) part of each term should approach zero, leaving n(-1) where n goes to infinity.
2007-04-19 02:02:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by cattbarf 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
limit as it goes to infinity is 0, so it converges. i think. well u can just plug in values and see they arent increasing or alternating, so by common sense converges. as for the sum well good night.
2007-04-19 02:00:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by dpmwcml 2
·
0⤊
2⤋