About like the DC hand gun ban is reducing murders in that city?
2007-04-18 18:02:22 · 8 answers · asked by steve d 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Notice also how D.C. also has one of the highest populations below the poverty line?
You also ignore the fact that the overwhelming violence in the District was present even when morons like you could pack heat.
Look to the root of the majority of gun violence - poverty.
Goffy: How bout not making it easy for them? At least without a gun you have a chance to fight back. Both of you with guns will just lead to you both dead.
2007-04-18 18:09:28 · answer #1 · answered by Darken 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
but.... he want outside the gun free zone to get those guns... maybe if the gun free zone was bigger he may have lost interest and gone home and forgot about the whole thing...
HELLO!!!!! as you Lib's can see, he brought the guns in the forbiddin zone. I can't believe he broke the rule. how could that happen? There was a rule! Criminals ALWAYS follow the rules. You see, cocaine is illegal everywhere in this country.. the whole country is a no cocaine free zone... this must be why we hardly see any of it right? How about actually enforcing stiffer penalties for crimes involving guns? You know, have the courts actually uphold the law. Crazy, I know, but it just might work.
2007-04-19 02:08:17 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Perfect 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep, that's the answer, don't let poor people buy guns. Obviously that's the problem.
Of course it looks like every other large, democrat controlled city. No one takes responsibility for thier actions and it's excuses like "They are poor" that makes them bold. They know they will be excused for thier actions because of the myraid of excuses given to them for thier "Condition".
I'm tired of hearing that it's not the criminal, it's the gun or his economic status that creates the crime.
The difference between right and wrong are not overshadowed by anything. You know what's right and you know what's wrong. stop making it sound like it's something other than the person doing the crime that is at fault.
2007-04-19 01:23:23 · answer #3 · answered by Talen 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh. You've been watching CNN, haven't you?
A little like blaming the victims there aren't you, pal? Students shouldn't have to be armed to attend school.
He went outside the gun free zone to get his guns, then returned with them. Ironically, if these places had been gun free as well, he never would have gotten the weapons.
2007-04-19 01:10:17 · answer #4 · answered by mithril 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Liberals are just trying to take away guns that can help protect our families. The banning guns won't stop people who plan on doing illegal things anyway. Liberals are idiots.
2007-04-19 01:09:15 · answer #5 · answered by Baby I'll stay, heaven can w 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Are you blaming the victims for not ducking fast enough?
The first action to overthrowing a form of government is to disarm the people.
That's my stance!!!
2007-04-19 01:16:00 · answer #6 · answered by nightrider 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
a person bound to kill will kill useing their hands an whatever they can pick up.
2007-04-19 01:06:37 · answer #7 · answered by RANDELL 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not sure about them, but here in Oregon, where we have concealed weapons permits and rifles in our homes, we're good, thanks for asking.
2007-04-19 01:09:33 · answer #8 · answered by The Forgotten 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋