No, I don't want to see the face of a killer on the home page. It makes me sick that they have to keep showing it. The first time ,right after they found out who he was, was enough. They need to focus more on the lives of the victims who were killed in this horrible tragedy.
2007-04-18 17:13:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~*Tweety Gurl*~ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he was screaming out for attention in what he did and by putting him all over the news and web is what he wanted. And when people are saying crap about it being the schools fault is obsurd. My university got a phone threat and we arent closing anything and I have no prob with that. People that do what he did are after feeling powerful or getting their name and picture on the news. A flash on the news of his face is one thing but on the home page of every news site is overkill.
2007-04-18 17:06:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by PW 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm prety sure the last thing he awanted was to be killed, and he's not alive so he doesnt care about the media, this is what what he believed to be his very last resort, he had been pushed to far and finaly snaped, over the egde, maybe the same thing any one els would have done in given the same life that was given to him whith the relentles treasing an taunting, he believe he had to do what he did not because he wanted to but because he had to. and if you had e to deal with what he did your whole life would you honestly say you wouldnt at least think about it???
2016-04-01 08:09:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's what they kill for, the fame, notoriety, teh news media is their willing co-conspirators and sponsors, they love mayhem, almost as much as the gun control advocates. Since Columbine I have suggested they never show the perpetrator's face or mention his name EVER again. Making them a "non-entity" or "nothing", it would not lessen the sacrifice or loss of loved ones to do so. But it would cost the newsmedia their ratings. I used to endorse not sharing the "why" they commit these acts, but evil needs to be exposed for what it is, jihad.
2007-04-18 17:03:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i totally understand what you mean. and i dont really want to see his face every time i log onto the net either.
But these kind of things are what get people reading the news. websites have these things on their home pages to draw peoples attention.
what a shame we dont search for the positive stories.
2007-04-18 17:03:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by SubbYMonKeY 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
i agree not to see the killer face, his hands with other victims blood.
we can see the professor face, when more professor kind of people, less "space " for the killer remain
2007-04-18 17:10:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Shen Zero 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree. We don't need to see his face anymore then we already have.
2007-04-18 17:37:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by T 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
nnnnnnnnnnnnn
oooooooooooo
don't care to see face of a murderer ever
2007-04-18 16:59:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by VK 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Agreement here.
2007-04-18 17:03:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
if you try that then your ignoring the evil that still walks among us.that would be ignorance
2007-04-18 17:03:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by dWs 2
·
1⤊
0⤋