I agree. I have heard the anchor on the news tell people to find a loner and draw that person into a group. Many people are "loners" because they are sick of the mental games, and the rest of the garbage that goes along with membership in a group. If a person is lonely, that is one thing, but people have a right to be left alone.
2007-04-18 15:16:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by MONK 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
I disagree cause what is wrong is the mere fact that he was a loner with problems others knew nothing about. When a person feel like everyone is against them they develop an attitude that everyone hates them and hatred makes one do stupid things cause they give up on life. But to nail others with him was wrong. He knew he was gonna go one way or another and apparently did not want to leave alone. that was rude and disgusting. To me lonely people only needs someone to care and love them. Some refuse help and for those kind of people there is just no hope.
2007-04-18 15:14:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by JoJoBa 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Josieb: I don't think you should classify a loner is someone that feels like the world is against them. Many people are loners for many different reasons, some that are not negative. For example, one of my best friends is somewhat a loner. He is extremely intelligent, almost genius level. He usually does not socialize simply because most people are not on his level. To be honest, I'm quite honor that someone as smart as him would consider me on his level. (I know it sounds arrogant, but the guy is really smart) But even at that, it is not like he is not approachable, if people ask him questions about things or whatever, he is very nice and answers back. The point is that you can't classify one type of person into a stereotype, just like you wouldn't class one race as certain stereotype. The Columbine shooters if I recall were not really loners, I mean they did belong to some sort of group right?
2007-04-18 15:59:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by hpotter4ever2000 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
I agree. I am probably more of a loner but I am not an angry and disturbed person. I have my head on my shoulder and I am fairly happy with my life. Some of us just prefer to be alone rather than hang out with big crowds. It just turns out that when you are always alone, you become a little mysterious to others and that might lead them to think something is wrong with you. I don't allow people to think that I am an angry person because even though I'm a loner, I'm open to people. Smiling, for example is a good way to get people to know you're fine.
2007-04-18 15:13:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
I would rather be alone than in the company of others anyday! I love being with my kids, but at the end of the day when they're asleep, it's the most peaceful time of the whole day for me.
Some of us prefer a night at home over a party, or a trip to the bookstore over a trip to the bar. It's just our way.
2007-04-18 15:29:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rapunzel XVIII 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Being an introvert and wanting alone time does not make a person dangerous. It does not make the person a ticking time bomb. Most people who could be termed 'loners', are not dangerous people. In fact, most are quite happy with their lives.
I really hope that people consider before making harmful assumptions about someone who is shy, quiet, or just a little bit different.
2007-04-18 15:09:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Julia Sugarbaker 7
·
9⤊
0⤋
i visit respond to in 2 areas. First, i'm a loner particularly too. i do no longer mean to be, somewhat particularly-it in basic terms handed off. I actually have a concern affirming myself or being forward adequate to seek for human beings. My brother, an impressive, humorous, interesting guy...on no account had a single pal the entire time starting to be up or into adulthood. entire loner. whilst our fam amassed, he stayed in his room. He grow to be incredible and we did no longer stimulate him adequate, i think. i like him particularly and understand him through fact the main specific human I even have ever encountered. he's impressive. He met an angel, from heaven. i actually knew her earlier he did, or maybe I enjoyed her angelic sweetness. She grow to be his appropriate, and that i do mean appropriate-tournament. She adores him and appreciates him for specific expertise. She's form of a loner too, yet now, they're companions for all times. I do have self belief God has some thing specific for you-you may desire to seek for Him and discover out what it is. Be open to issues He might have in keep for you. 2d area to it is: Biblically, we've been created to be business corporation, friends-to God. We have been created for his Fellowship. It outlines a number of places that, "..it grow to be no longer sturdy for guy to be on my own.." our interpretation is that we are social beings by using nature. as quickly as we are on my own, it is going against achronic and purpose that we've been created with and for. for this reason, no longer fulfilling all we've been introduced right here for. might go away you feeling that there is a few thing lacking. you weren't made to proceed to exist on my own. the answer, as I see it? Get plugged in with a sturdy church and actively take part in adult males's activities. you will bond with different adult males, and develop your social community, for this reason inviting the potential of looking that distinctive female who grow to be created to enhance you. I desire you properly!
2016-10-03 05:35:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's absolutely nothing wrong with being a loner...if it's your choice (and it doesn't hurt you) to be one.
I disagree. I don't think people generally notice if, or if not, another individual joins large groups...so I don't think they'll be treated as if they're "doing something wrong."...Unless they actually DO something wrong.
2007-04-18 15:26:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by biiiiaaach 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
There is nothing wrong with being a loner as long as your not unhappy about it. If your comfortable and happy then your vibes will reflect around you and you won't come of as a threat
Now in this case.. all the signs were there this was our chance to prevent something and again we failed.
What we should be asking ourselves is how to improve. Not place blame.
2007-04-18 15:10:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by dawnsmysticalwonders 3
·
7⤊
0⤋
Good question. I noticed this happening in some of the TV interviews too. As if there were a new class of suspect people we should be careful of.
2007-04-18 15:50:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Wave 4
·
2⤊
0⤋