English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am. he's phycho. he hides from people, wore sun glasses during the day, killed 33 people, killed himself, sent a box to a news channel before he killed himself and in it was photos of himself with guns, he also stalked ladies, and wrote very disturbing things. Did i mention he never spoke his name and when the etacher asked he just sat there. Im glad he's dead. How bout u?

2007-04-18 11:22:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

11 answers

Yes, I'm glad he shot himself and saved the taxpayers the burden of maintaining him in jail, defending him via public defender, etc.

2007-04-18 11:25:19 · answer #1 · answered by Stimpy 7 · 0 2

eventhough he took 32 other peoples life he shouldn't have killed himself. No one shoud take their life it is better to live in a jail for the rest of your life instead of not having a life at all

2007-04-18 18:35:07 · answer #2 · answered by sj13 1 · 0 0

No, he was a depressed and troubled individual. Hate, the same emotion you are displaying right now, is the reason why he shot those kids. Quit being a hate-monger.

2007-04-18 18:26:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I am glad he's dead. But I wish he could have felt the world's disgust first. I doubt he would have gotten off on that.

2007-04-18 18:28:15 · answer #4 · answered by lei 5 · 0 2

I can think of better things to be glad about. Violence in any form was never one of them, sorry.

2007-04-18 18:25:57 · answer #5 · answered by Singthing 4 · 3 0

YES AND NO./YES BECAUSE HE IS NOT GOING TO HEART ANY BODY ELL'S NO MORE!!!!!! AND NO/BECAUSE HE WAS A MAN THAT DID NOT RECEIVE MEDICAL HELP FOR HIS PSYCHOSES.IF HE HAD;33 PEOPLE AND MORE PLUS HEM WOULD BE ALIVE TODAY!AND WHO KNOWS MAYBE ALL OF THEM HAPPY???

2007-04-18 18:42:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think that he was just very stupid. If I were him and something like that happened I would just tell my parents. Plus wouldn't you rather kill yourself than go and force yourself with a wet sponge on your head and sitting on a electrical chair?

2007-04-18 18:29:14 · answer #7 · answered by finity023 3 · 0 2

No. It made identifying him- that much harder. "Kicking a killer" after he's dead- doesn't accomplish much. It just just shows how futile anger is.

2007-04-18 18:29:50 · answer #8 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 2 0

of course I'm not glad he was crazy he didn't talk to anybody and in Mexico they say antisocial that means he doesn't talk to anybody

2007-04-18 18:31:16 · answer #9 · answered by honor 2 · 0 1

NO because it was the cowardly way out.

2007-04-18 18:30:33 · answer #10 · answered by pmdan00 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers