I would implement more effective gun control
I'll lower taxes, withdrawl troops from Iraq and afghanistan
put more money into healthcare and education
have a government run health care system which would allow free medicare for everyone even for those that don't have any money to afford it just like in Canada!
My government would cover the cost of it
2007-04-18 10:50:40 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Why do Americans think Canada is socialist? Are they that stupid they don't understand politics. Yes I'd vote for you.
2007-04-22 02:07:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't bother. You're wasting your time. Find a vital platform on which to run in this country instead! What about effective resource management? What about stopping the export of raw materials from this country? Did you know we contract out our logging to American companies, sell our raw lumber to the US way below market value, then buy it back at an inflated rate after their mills have finished it? Meantime, we have mills right here in our own backyard that are sitting dormant. Why are we sending our jobs south? Why are we sending our exports south? We're sending our whole damned economy south! It's ridiculous. I would love to see a candidate who would face the facts and do something about it!
2007-04-19 07:17:44 · answer #2 · answered by mamaDee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You would "implement" more gun control which means spend more money, but lower taxes which I assume will help pay for hte implementation of more gun control, and save us some money by withdrawing troops from the Middle East but then have to pay for damages inflicted on us by Middle Eastern radicals that will simply follow our soldiers home and then have to raise taxes to provide for socialized medicine (oops you didn't say that but its real) so - no I would not vote for you.
2007-04-18 10:55:57 · answer #3 · answered by netjr 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
My government would cover the cost of it
If MY taxes were that high, I'd NEED 'free' health-care and a gun.
2007-04-18 14:10:05 · answer #4 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would run for the head of your own country. Work on the issues they have before working on ours.
2007-04-18 11:28:25 · answer #5 · answered by biogirl23 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wouldn't be YOUR government-it would remain ours.
Beside that-you most be a natural born American Citizen.
Oh,by the way,nothing is FREE.
2007-04-21 12:45:31 · answer #6 · answered by david o 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. You would be a Canadian, and it would be a conflict of interests. Besides, if you made healthcare universal in the States, where would your fellow Canadians be able to go for personal medical care that fits their needs?
2007-04-18 10:55:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hell no! I hate socialism, and that's exactly what you would bring on!
You can't have lower taxes and have universal healthcare and all the other socialist programs! It's an oxymoron, who do you think pays for those government programs...ah.... the tax payers you dolt!
2007-04-18 10:55:36 · answer #8 · answered by Bunz 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
And then we would have a reputation like yours. No thanks. Canada is simply that country that is on the border of the World's leading economic and military power. You should be trying to be more like us, and less French.
2007-04-18 13:58:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Not a chance. You would set us all up for dissaster. Even more so than now.
2007-04-22 02:33:07 · answer #10 · answered by doctdon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋