I don't think we should as what in the world can we do about it? We have no control over it so why worry about it?
2007-04-18 12:33:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Steve S 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
predicting the apacolypse has been going on since Nero was throwing Christians to the lions, every turn of the Century, every end of the millenia, the 7th Day Adventists had their day in 1912, the Jim Jones cult and wacko in Waco both had their days, every passing of Haley's comet, eclipse of the sun and other end-of earth prophesies that i'm sure i missed. One thing you can be sure of, the arsenals of the US and Russia can obliterate a million Hiroshimas.
It could be 28 minutes from now or 280 years from now. When the superpowers square off against each other in two camps, then come back and we'll talk apacolpse.
Until then, just think regional conflicts, wars between rump states, proxy wars and brinksmanship. If you recall the Yom Kippur War in 1973, a coalition of Arab States (Egypt, Syria and Jordan) were soundly defeated by the Israelis. That was a worse situation than the current conflict and it didn't raise a blip on the world war radar (not that it didn't have the potential to spark a global war).
The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.
Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask when is the apacolypse, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.
Our biggest risk is an accidental launch of nukes by one of the nuclear powers.
2007-04-18 19:32:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why? we can't do anything about it. We try to be healthy safe people, but it is all just a trick. we are trying to convince ourselves that by eating vegetables and wearing our seatbelts that we are somehow immune to death, that a semi couldn't just run us over in an instant or any other absurdity.
2007-04-18 17:22:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by FIGJAM 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No people should not be concerned about "the end of time."
Why worry about something you can't do anything about?
People should worry about the end of THEIR own time.
2007-04-18 17:18:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
definitley. we are in the times of the end right now. most of our population will be deceased by 12/21/2012, mark my words!
2007-04-18 17:18:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by waterlily750 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
not necessarily, until aliens start bombing us, then we should be concerned by the end of us. The end of time will not start until much, much later. so chill...
2007-04-18 17:22:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by evil.spammer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. You can't make arrangements for what you'll do once it happens. No point in being concerned.
2007-04-18 17:23:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by pwagner22 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
should people be concerned about death? no. that would be a waste of life. haha. get it? that's the same question.
2007-04-18 17:19:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by *C*A*Y*L*A* 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
why?
2007-04-18 17:18:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by sockerchicka 3
·
0⤊
0⤋