ACLU Protected Right of "Nut" Cho to Live Near Other People.?

Question

Libs will ignore that and blame the NRA and all of the hunters.

Right?

For those of you who need further explanation...

... The police and others have limited ability to protect the public from people like Cho who have been under professional treatment.

Why?

BECAUSE THE ACLU WON'T LET THE POLICE PROTECT YOU FROM POTENTIAL NUTS.

BUT, Libs want to trample on the rights of innocent gunowners and the 2nd amendment and blame the NRA for crimes.

Answer 1

That's the ACLU for you. A bunch of idiots..

Answer 2

If you have been seeing the questions asked on Yahoo! Answers forum, you will see that the Libs are already attacking the NRA, and the second amendment, the right to bare arms.
The facts are this Asian fellow, already had two stalking reports against him by two women, and the police basically ignored them. It has nothing to do with firearms, and more to do with the police, and the VT school ignoring all the warning signs. This man proved before he committed these atrocious acts, that he was a danger to society, and the people in charge of the society, did NOTHING!

Answer 3

This has nothing to do with the ACLU nor the NRA. It has everything to do with a mentally deranged person. Also the fact that police did not respond or do anything for two and a half hours should be the real issue here. I couldn't imagine firefighters waiting 2 hours to go into a burning building, that is ridiculous.

Answer 4

I wasn't aware that Cho's right to live other people was in need of protecting by the ACLU. He was obviously disturbed. Ultimately, the blame has to placed with him---as a disturbed person.

Answer 5

Do you have a site or link to the case where the ACLU represented Cho?

Answer 6

Actually, they were busy investigating the shootings in the dorm rooms when he stormed the classroom. So, don't blame the police, and many students knew that there had been a shooting, just not in the classroom yet. How can police be all around that campus at one given moment looking for an unidentified killer?

Answer 7

correct me if im wrong, but he had been to a psychiatric hospital before.. and he had guns.. i dont know if the guns were legal, but if they were then i think people have a right to say the NRA isnt doing its job very well. some might call that liberal, others would call it logical.
and i think the problem goes a lot deeper then a simple aclu or nra blaming tactic.

Answer 8

The NRA protected the right of "Nut" Cho, as you called him, to legally buy the guns and ammo he used.

The ACLU never had any connection to him. You merely hallucinated that.

Answer 9

When did the ACLU represent Cho?

Do you have a link?

Answer 10

You are so right. For future use please feel free to let people know more on ACLU.

www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/sep/05092102.html

ACLU Founder a Communist Ideologue Bent on Uprooting Judeo-Christian Foundation of America


GRANTS PASS, OR, September 22, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The founder of the American Civil Liberties Union was a card-carrying communist whose goal was to undermine the Judeo-Christian foundations of America, according to author David Kupelian.
The ACLU is “engaged in trying to eliminate every vestige of Judeo-Christian expression in public places in America,” Kupelian explained in his landmark book, The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom, according to a review by Agape press. “It's frightening -- and they are using our tax dollars to do this. They use the laws of the land to get American taxpayers to spend their hard-earned money, actually financing their own destruction.”
The ultimate goal of the ACLU is to see an America “with little or no public vestige left of religious faith and the traditional family,” according to the Alliance Defense Fund’s Alan Sears and Craig Osten, who wrote the book, The ACLU vs. America.
The goals of the ACLU were clear from the group’s founding, as indicated by the writings of its founder, Roger Baldwin: “I am for socialism, disarmament, and ultimately for abolishing the state itself as an instrument of violence and compulsion. I seek social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class… Communism is the goal.”
The ACLU “positions itself as the great defender of rights, [but] is against the right of parents not to allow their children to participate in assemblies and curricula that actively undermine and ridicule their religious beliefs,” according to Sears and Osten, commenting on the ACLU’s successful bid to force public school children in California to attend classes that indoctrinate

Answer 11

ACLU protected your right to live near others.

Whether you are a nut is to be determined.