Nope. Frankly, I would consider him an open minded individual - IF the candidate was a good one in his own right. I would hate to think that I would be involved with a homophobic moron who can't see the forest for the trees. In the case of Guiliani, it is not his stunt in a dress that would dissuade me, but his politics. And I would hope that anyone makes the same decision...based upon the issues...not stunts.
2007-04-18 09:19:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Super Ruper 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
maybe the man has friends who are homosexual. The man could have strong opinions on free rights and agreeing with the fact that other people are have free will and should be allowed to choose their sexuality and way of life. People can be happy with the ideas about something without embracing it themselves. You can agree with something without doing it. The party in question might have strong views on other things which the man agrees with- maybe homosexuality isnt an issue at all for him- its just something the party believes in which he doesnt find important.
2007-04-18 09:22:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kirsty R 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, don't have to worry about that, I'm already married and have my lovely children to keep me busy! I do have a crazy cat lady friend though; she's an ex-nun actually!
2016-05-18 01:59:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends on hw u look at it,if u think u hv a reason to worry then u got a lot of digging to do before completely jumping into the potentially wrong conclusion (which is something us woman are notorious for ). But i think it shows that he is open-minded and he believes that every person is unique and he actually considers them to be human and not a curse upon the face of the earth..and atleast he is expressing his views freely, if it were done in hiding,i'd think otherwise..
2007-04-18 09:23:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is that the first thing you think about when evaluating parties? I think you got some issues yourself. I should worry if my guy voted for a party that closeted gay men in it. I'm a Libertarian by the way.
2007-04-18 09:19:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by cynical 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wasn't aware the being homosexual was only a man thing, what about the lesbians they are homosexual. My man would vote for just that reason, he loves women
2007-04-18 09:21:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tessy 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
There's nothing wrong with a man dressing up like a woman for a costume or a publicity stunt.
2007-04-18 09:22:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sean 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Homosexuality and cross-dressing are two different things. In fact, I know 2 male cross-dressers that are completely straight. :)
Being supportive of homosexuality doesn't automatically make you or your "man" a homosexual. It just means they supports people no matter what their sexual orientation is.
Of course he could be bi (lucky you) or secretly gay (your new best shopping buddy). But geez, give the guy a break.
2007-04-18 09:20:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sophie 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
A.) Not all homosexuals dress in women's clothing
B.) Why would I worry? It doesn't mean he's gay it just means he is accepting of other peoples personal choices.
2007-04-18 09:29:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by MLE 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Myself personally, I wouldn't worry,
unless you know, he starts acting gay or something.
Or unless your homophobic and your against gays
and have some weird problem with him voting for a party thats
pro homosexual.
2007-04-18 09:19:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Keep calm, study on 🎓 3
·
0⤊
1⤋