English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

why did she say that if it wasn't true?

2007-04-18 08:26:13 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

AlD: It is wise to study the ways of the enemy?

2007-04-18 08:36:14 · update #1

http://www.youtube/watch?v=BMOVV2pfo

2007-04-18 09:42:14 · update #2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h3G-Im2xjo

2007-04-18 09:45:55 · update #3

24 answers

I'll tell ya ... that George Bush gets more done in a day than I could in a lifetime! I mean blowing up the World Trade Center, the oil crisis, starting wars, global warming, Hurricane Katrina and now this. I have definitely got to learn his time management secrets!

By the way, the last two times I ordered pizza, it was delivered late and cold and I think he's got something to do with that too.

2007-04-18 08:37:17 · answer #1 · answered by Emily Dew 7 · 3 0

Hillary and the rest of these idiots have no real plan for our country. All they can do is dream up scandals which have no basis in fact. They blame America for Global Warming(which is a crock),AIDS and every other bad thing on Earth.

2007-04-18 14:17:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have been wartching the coverage of the Virginia Tech tragedy on CNN, and I have not seen Hillary Clinton. In fact, I think that all any of the presidential hopefuls have said at this point is that they are offering their condolences.
I think that you are mistaken.

2007-04-18 08:47:11 · answer #3 · answered by Tricia R 4 · 3 0

So what's new? This wouldn't be Hillary's first lie.

How on earth can President Bush possibly be blamed for the actions of another individual, particularly this social misfit?

Blame the college administration and teachers, or the local police if you like for lack of preparedness and slow response. Blame the poor students for letting themselves be shot like fish in a barrel instead of figting back (ludicrous that 32 victims could be killed and a dozen more wounded with only 50 cartridges). They could have easily stopped one shooter who was dumb enough to lock himself into close quarters.

2007-04-18 08:44:38 · answer #4 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 3 2

Bull, I went to CNN website and she said no such thing. Provide a link or retract statement. Hillary is an idealogue, but she's not that dense.

2007-04-18 09:34:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh please. Did she really say that? It reminds me of right after Katrina, I saw some rich rap star on TV say that he looked out his window and he didn't see Bush coming to his rescue. I don't like Bush either, but I realize he can't be daddy to everybody. The Virginia Tech thing was a horrible tragedy, and only the demented little man who did it is to blame.

2007-04-18 08:39:38 · answer #6 · answered by cynthiajean222 6 · 4 1

The Dem's are so used to blaming Bush for everything this is just another issue to Blame on Bush.

What their ***** is; is that Bush allowed the Assault weapons ban to expire which limited the clip sizes that Americans could have.

What she is not realizing is that Cho was reloading in 2 seconds. It would not have mattered if cho had 16 round clips or 10 round clips he would have had to ensure that he had more clips. Reloading in 2 seconds makes no difference. The only limit that Cho had was the number of clips he could fit on his body. I do not see an issue with having more clips to make up the difference.

2007-04-18 08:33:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

I wouldn't be surprised IF she had but she blames him for everything else. He's one busy guy to single-handedly cause the downfall of the World don't ya' think?

2007-04-18 09:23:11 · answer #8 · answered by infidel-louie 5 · 2 0

Why are you watching CNN? You should be watching the Daily Show or the Colbert Report.

2007-04-18 08:33:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

except for the actual undeniable actuality that fifty seven% of Democrats voted antagonistic to the determination to invade Iraq. as antagonistic to both.6% of republicans that voted antagonistic to the determination. What does it sense favor to invent historic previous?

2016-12-04 06:30:34 · answer #10 · answered by digioia 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers