Wouldn't have killed himself and took hostages instead, and it came down to him holding a gun someones head and telling police if they don't let him leave he will shoot them, And all the while theirs a sharp shooter with a perfect shot to the guys head to take him out and save the innocent person.. What would you rather happen? Would you say it's o.k. for the Sharp shoter to kill him? Or would you want the cops to let the man leave?
This question is intended for those who want Guns banned all together! Not for those who want stritcter gun laws or who already support guns.. ONLY for the ones who want them gone completely.
2007-04-18 08:11:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
KooKoo: It's a Typo sugar... People can make mistakes.. No need to rewrite it.. Just answer it. you know what I mean
2007-04-18 08:17:38 · update #1
I'm not debating weather or not guns should be banned or not, I'm asking Those who think they should be banned COMPLETELY what they would rather happen... YOU PEOPLE ARE MISSING THE POINT
2007-04-18 11:55:22 · update #2
Honestly, guns do not have to be banned altogether, just as long as you are employed by a government agency like police officer, FBI, or military. Thats what I think should happen. But I would want the sharpshooter to shoot him with a perfect shot. It is peoples lives on the line.
2007-04-18 08:20:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
By banned altogether, you must mean banned for phsychopaths, too. Therefore the shooter wouldn't have had a gun, and neither would the sharpshooter. Instead, about 100 students could have taken the shooter down with rubber bands, the big ones. Those things sting.
2007-04-18 08:19:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
A shotgun with no shells is stupid!!!
If you ban guns only criminals will have them that makes every one of us an easy victim!!!
Besides any kook can build a bomb from store bought products!! A bomb would be much worse than a gun!! no warning just dead and many more people killed in a split second!!!!
2007-04-18 08:23:48 · answer #3 · answered by and socialism 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
properly apparently there have been signs and indications of him being unusual and morbid for loss of extra suitable words. i'm no longer able to blame his classmates for ignoring him, i could desire to circumvent him too for worry of coming up him indignant. The gunshop bought him a gun and that i assume accompanied all suggestions which contain a historic past examine. except he have been categorised with the aid of one way or the different below regulation to no longer have a firearm, it became into criminal. individually, you shouldn't be waiting to purchase ammo off of Ebay, it truly is in simple terms loopy!! yet returned, you could no longer blame that guy or woman, the only stupid element they did became into sell it interior the 1st place on line. the guy did no longer comprehend who they're merchandising to, and he did no longer sell the firearm with it. the persons i think are to place some proportion of blame to are the government for no longer arresting him and looking out after the challenge whilst he became into stalking. it truly is a severe element whilst somebody is going into stalking. they don't seem to be mentally sturdy. Which brings me to the different proportion of blame, the psychological well being centers. i'm uncertain how long they did carry him, yet there are particular regulations against retaining somebody against thier will. i've got faith it truly is usually a seventy two hour assessment, then in accordance to the well being practitioner that evaluates. that's totally obtrusive this guy necessary help. The well being practitioner that evaluated him and enable him bypass is the single in charge a huge proportion on. I additionally positioned some blame on his father and mom and kinfolk. I doubt that this became into habit that in simple terms got here out of no the place. His kinfolk would desire to have seen to it that he have been seeing somebody and had him evaluated as properly. that's in simple terms my opinion, I easily won't comprehend the finished information someplace.
2016-12-16 09:23:26 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The police would not simply let the man walk away. If no other option were available, you can bet your bottom dollar that a sharpshooter would take the gunman's head off.
2007-04-18 08:16:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Shoot,hostages are seldom recovered alive.
2007-04-18 08:17:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
you can "what if" all you want, their was nothing that could have been done for this not to have happen! this was meant to happen the way it happened. and the ONLY thing or PERSON to blame is THE SHOOTER
and i believe in our right to bear arm's
2007-04-18 08:18:45 · answer #7 · answered by kelly 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It would be okay for the cops to shoot him.
2007-04-18 08:30:58 · answer #8 · answered by cynical 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
""and i believe in our right to bare arm's ""
kelly , if thats you in that pic you can have bare anything you want, but did you mean bear arms.
2007-04-18 08:22:26 · answer #9 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
darn...I thought that I could answer this question, till I read the second paragraph.
2007-04-18 08:17:08 · answer #10 · answered by auditor4u2007 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋