Why do cons trust big govt to make personal decisions over personal responsibility?

Question

Like big govt to make decisions on whether they will die from a seriously gone wrong pregnancy.

Yes, it is a fact that the national association of Obstetricians was intensely against banning partial birth abortions. But who do cons truth more with personal decisions and medical information? Pat Robertson and Bush.

Cons now demand that both the mother and baby die, rather than saving the mother.

Cons spew sh¡t that they are the party or personal responsibility and less govt, but everything they do in reality is in conflict with that BS.

Answer 1

The Obstetricians were against banning partial-birth abortion because they make money off it. The law states that partial birth abortion is only allowed to save the life of the mother. No women are going to die because of the ban. There is practically no reason for a doctor to abort a fetus by inducing a breach birth and removing the infant's brain while it is half in and half out of its mother. It occurs at a point at which the child could survive on its own. The procedure is more traumatic for the mother than inducing labor and delivering that child. If the health of the mother is at risk they can induce and deliver the child and at least give it a chance at life.