I Recently Watched Farenheit 9/11 Followed by FarenHYPE 9/11. The former was an interesting movie, until the latter seemed to give A whole bunch more perspective to Moore's version of the truth. (Which, according to the movie, Moore doesn't seem to know what the truth is... or worse doesn't want the American Public to know the truth). Has Moore responded publicly to Farenhype 9/11? Is he really that much of a dishonest jackass?? I Highly reccomend anyone who watches Farenheit 9/11 also watch Farenhype 9/11. It appears to debunk just about all of the positions Michael Moore espouses in his movie, and it certainly puts context back in where Moore has removed it (certainly not for Documentary reasons, but to promote his adgenda)
2007-04-18 05:18:41 · 8 answers · asked by Brando Calrissian 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
He hasn't responded to it.
If you want further proof of the type of person he is, there is a book called "Michael Moore is a Big Fat Stupid White Man." It debunks almost all of his "documentaries" and his lifestyle as well.
I find it interesting that while George Bush Sr. never sued Moore, several servicemen who were featured in F9/11 did sue him, saying they were lied to about what he was filming, and misrepresented as being against the war.
2007-04-18 05:28:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Politics aside, my opinion of Michael Moore has been that he's an asinine buttinsky blowhard ever since he made Roger and Me back in 1989 or so. When someone makes a movie by taking a video camera and basically stalking a CEO (or gathering behind-the-back gossip about him), you gotta wonder whether said moviemaker is operating with all his marbles.
2007-04-18 05:32:10 · answer #2 · answered by Navigator 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fahrenhype is a piece of crap.
Coulter babbling irrelevancies about the Kurds, Crazy Zell Miller, Dick Morris for godsakes?
Certainly doesn't rise above the level of any of Moore's tactics. Both films are slanted opinion pieces, but it is abundantly clear that in this instance, Moore has picked the side that the majority of Americans endorse. Sorry, cons, you can't refer to him as a fringe liberal any more, at least not in this case, when the majority of Americans are resoundingly against this war.
2007-04-18 05:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Having saw both films, It really opened my eyes to how full of feces Moore really is. Like many liberals in the media he is interested in the illusion of the truth.
He just has to say something dumb enough, long enough to get people to believe that it's true. Of course I don't think he will readily admit that he has made millions off of American tragedies like 9/11 and colombine.
2007-04-18 05:25:51 · answer #4 · answered by evil_paul 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes Michal Moore is full of ****. He often edits and splices his films so that it looks like people say and do things that they did not. All you have to do is go to google and serch for him and his lies, there is another movie called Michael Moore hates america, that you should check out
2007-04-18 05:34:01 · answer #5 · answered by gregorhansel 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i fell asleep TWICE watching "heit". no joke! i figured, since i'm not "polluted", i don't NEED to run out and get "hype".
Mr. Bush has been unreasonably, and irrationally hated from the primaries of 1999, so i don't really need someone to defend our government to me.
2007-04-18 05:26:04 · answer #6 · answered by daddio 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the very fact that Bush senior denounced it as lies and slander yet never pursued Moore in court is what gives it it's greatest vote of credibility
2007-04-18 05:24:17 · answer #7 · answered by Alan S 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes he is Do some research
2007-04-18 06:11:05 · answer #8 · answered by Robert R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋