English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

There are generally held to be two of them, World War I, which began in 1914 with the German Empire, the
Austro-Hungarian Empire and their allies on one side (The Central Powers) and Britain, France, Russia (and later the US) on the other (The Allied Powers). This was a primarily European war.

World War II was really, truly global. There are differing opinions among historians as to when it began--some say it really started in around 1930 with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria, while others feel that it was the Nazi invasion of Poland in 1939 that really got it going. Either way, there was an alliance of Germany, Italy, and Japan, called the Rome-Berlin-Tokyo Axis (hence the name Axis Powers).

At first, Britain was about the only European power fighting the Nazis, because France fell in 1940. The Nazis also invaded the former Soviet Union, violating the
non-aggression treaty the two countries had signed--and getting the Germans into a two-front war.

After the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor in 1941, the US got involved, declaring war not only on Japan, but on its European allies as well--so it was a two-front war for the Americans as well. Britain, the US, and the Soviet Union formed the Allied forces, or "Allies."

2007-04-18 05:14:59 · answer #1 · answered by Chrispy 7 · 1 0

Whole libraries of books have been written on that topic. Briefly there were two World Wars in the 20th century.
World War One was between Germany, Austria, and Turkey against Britain, France, Russia, and the U.S. There were other smaller nations on either side.
World War Two involved Germany and Italy against France, Britain, Russia, and the U.S. while Japan fought The U.S. and Britain. (In each case "Britain" involved Commonwealth countries as well).
For more information type "World War One" and "World War Two" into a decent search engine.
I recommend Google.
Hope this helps.

2007-04-18 05:19:09 · answer #2 · answered by Tony B 6 · 0 0

First seem for risky circumstances in a rustic or international places with adequate power to start up a warfare of that value. Russia matches the bill. the middle East, even taken as an entire lacks the protection stress may to be a intense danger. the different substantial powers are too good presently to enter a incredibly devastating warfare. That leaves Russia. anticipate that circumstances there'll proceed to degenerate (there are quite some signals which seem to point in that route). even as circumstances worsen in any united states, human beings have a tendency to choose an risky and unsafe chief whose own temperament matches that of the country. Now element them at a source of their soreness. maximum will undergo in recommendations the empire days of the U.S. with a clean fondness and seem to regain that empire. yet the position to strike? South, around the Baltic, must be the most tempting objective for persons if prodded staggering by way of their administration, touching off a conflict with the Ukraine which may have the flair to boost via bringing in distinct different international places on differing aspects of the conflict. even as will this take position? possibly not in any respect, even if that's nonetheless the most possibly conflict of that value contained in the subsequent fifty years. if it is going to, the right time body is about 25-35 years from now. Who will win? Russia and her allies. Why? because the international is sick-prepared to strive against a substantial power that abuses that power on the instant. short of direct provocation, no substantial power will challenge yet another substantial power contained in the present international scene. the point of devastation that would nicely be levied on both component of the conflict is unacceptable to a inhabitants that has grown acquainted with a modern high quality of existence.

2016-12-04 06:15:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers