English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

To me, it looks first like a (((disaster))). Secondly, it looks like a civil war/policing action/occupation/rebuilding. What the hell would you call that?

2007-04-18 04:14:57 · 7 answers · asked by Gemini 5 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

On here many times in the last 2 years I have said," It is what it was meant to be , a Religious riot. We are in the beginning, yes, only just the beginning of the first ever modern world, worldwide religious riot.

2007-04-18 04:28:43 · answer #1 · answered by asmikeocsit 7 · 0 0

When armies shoot at each other it is a war. You can call it a police action or an opportunity to bring democracy to some poor nation but it is a war nevertheless. Civil war is still war. Although some of the warriors are not in military uniform (Muslim radicals) they are soldiers nevertheless.

2007-04-18 11:19:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It's a civil war that the US shouldn't be in. Notice how the administration doesn't use the word "war"? It's an "insurgency". Now doesn't that make us all feel better?

2007-04-18 11:19:14 · answer #3 · answered by katydid 7 · 1 1

War against humanity.

2007-04-18 11:24:16 · answer #4 · answered by Pretty Girl 4 · 0 0

Futile. Usless violence. A pointless war enforced by the Missing Link (a.k.a Bush).

2007-04-18 11:19:26 · answer #5 · answered by Sandra 1 · 2 0

I would call it a stale and moldy shitsandwich for which we collectively have paid half a trillion dollars, and which we are still going to have to eat.

2007-04-18 11:23:59 · answer #6 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 0 0

a complete mess,that the united states is right in the middle of!

2007-04-18 11:21:14 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers