This is an actual quote from an AP article released this morning talking about partial birth abortion.
>>>>The procedure at issue involves partially removing the fetus intact from a woman's uterus, then crushing or cutting its skull to complete the abortion.
Abortion opponents say the law will not reduce the number of abortions performed because an alternate method — dismembering the fetus in the uterus — is available and, indeed, much more common.<<<<<
I wanted to puke reading that. Any person involved in this procedure, either patient or doctor, either procedure, needs to be tried for murder and genocide.
2007-04-18 03:48:18 · 6 answers · asked by scottdman2003 5 in Health ➔ Women's Health
For Wright S
When you can be a human being you might have the right to even consider having a child.
2007-04-19 02:25:46 · update #1
I need to clarify something.
Indeed, if the mothers life is at risk in later term pregnancy, although still a tough choice. It's her choice to make.
But to allow this method for someone who just changes their mind, or otherwise says, oooops I did it again, should absolutely positively be banned in those instances.
2007-04-19 02:29:08 · update #2
Abortion is the New holocaust, genocide is right my friend. 40 MILLION Children have been put to death, at least, and the number is climbing by well over a million a year. http://www.abort73.com this is an Excellent website that will tell you literally everything you need to know about the matter in detail. Um, theres a video where it shows you what abortion actually does (I suggest people who are pro choice have a look what their political views actually end in) and i think you would really benefit from seeing. Late term abortions are the worst, they take a child that WOULD live outside the womb, and kill it instead of simply having the child and adopting him out, to one of the millions of families in America that are on HUGE waiting lists... and forced do adopt foreign children. Read that webpage, you'll see how brutal abortion really is.
2007-04-19 06:43:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am pro choice but I feel there should be certain consequences that take place. Teenagers that come in to get an abortion is fine because obviously they can take care of a child. That teenager should go through some kind of education program so they wont end up getting pregnant again. If the teenager ends up getting pregnant again then some strict rehab needs to take place. If it happens a third time it is probably best to sterilize the person. They should not be able to reproduce if they are really that irresponsible. For older married and single women they should have a choice because mistakes happen. Same thing for the teenagers though, third time they should be sterilized. My thoughts. One more thing: My husband is pro life and I asked him one time if he remembers the pain of when his foreskin was removed. Of course he doesn't he was a baby. Same kind of thinking for a fetus. They won't know.
2016-05-18 00:19:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Call me cruel, but I do not think so. I would much rather have an abortion than raise a child that I ended up with due to rape. Also, some women are not capable of safely giving birth, and therefore; die. I do however find abortion wrong if a women "whores" around then has an abortion. Yes, I am aware or adoption. Also, I am pretty sure you are a guy. Think of it from a women's perspective.
2007-04-18 04:30:52 · answer #3 · answered by xnocturnal_dreamsx 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I am pro choice...they should print some things about child abuse from Moms that didnt want their babies...and some that couldnt feed them....
2007-04-18 04:51:37 · answer #4 · answered by CJ 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
When you can get pregnant then you might have the right to an opinion on this matter.
2007-04-19 02:14:14 · answer #5 · answered by American Spirit 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes it is
2007-04-21 07:29:25 · answer #6 · answered by SAHM/Part Time Tutor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋