If the US in its infinite stupidity invaded Iran then Yes it would because they, unlike Iraq, CAN fight back. Do we really have any idea how far along they are in their nuclear program? No and a company that was working on finding that out was dismantled by the very government that was supposed to keep it secret- Brewster Jennings.
Then the other countries in the region will join in because the US pre-emptively attacked a country that did not attack them and then would be seen as doing it again in Iran. The region will itself feel as if their country might be next and that will send up the powder keg that is already smoldering in the Middle East. Countries like Russia and China will probably support Iran, because the US has been alienating the Russians ( good going) and chaos will spread around the globe.
If we "nuke em" as some rabid people here would say, then there would be retaliation and then no one will survive except the politicians in their underground fortified bunkers. The rest of the world's population will cease to exist. Hell of a wake up call ain't it?
2007-04-18 03:51:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by thequeenreigns 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
WORLD war means that many countries become involved in a conflict. If China and Russia back Iran that would mean WW3 and possibly the end of the world. We couldn't handle a war with all three nations.
(I doubt we could even handle a war with China, and anyone who thinks we can is beyond arrogant)
2007-04-18 03:49:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is a probability that China would try to prevent the marauding Yankees from controlling this amount of world oil production.
While WW3 is unlikely, there may be significant amounts of casualties followed by a world recession following a break in Sino-US trade.
Some US analysts already regard the future of Sino-US relations with pessimism so Bush and his Israeli masters should be very apprehensive of extending their piracy to Iran.
2007-04-18 04:01:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Clive 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Iran would attack Israel. They see Israel as being the USA. We would of course defend Israel at any cost. Yes WW3. Now tell me. Who would give Iran a reason to buy a WMD on the black market and take out Israel? Hint, we have a incompetent, Hitler like, delusional person with his finger on the button in the White House. The Impeachment of Bush and Cheney is the only course of action for Democrats in Congress. BTW, why would anyone with even half a brain get any information from Glenn Beck or Rush both are proven liars.
2007-04-18 03:54:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't think that's far-fetched at all....I believe that we're currently setting the stage/in the beginning stages of WW3. Problem is, I also believe that what is going on now is necessary and inevitable (here come the thumbs down lol) The following link provides info on Iran, immigration, oil shortage, etc. All of these problems are putting America in a tough situation, which seems to only be getting worse. Although it's on Glenn Beck's website, the info gathered is nonpartisan and meant only for informative purposes, gathered from media around the globe (both lib and conservative media). Check it out if you have the time.
2007-04-18 03:53:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by suzyq 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
no. Iran is unlikely to call upon many other nations to come to its aid. I can only see Syria being the only Islamic country who might be willing to intervene on its behalf. Two countries which I would not say have the comparative military might of Japan and Germany did in relative terms during the Second World War. Also any conflict would be confined to the Middle East and thus could not be properly referred to as a 'world' war but rather a regional conflict much like Israels wars with its Arab neighbours during the 60s.
2007-04-18 03:52:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by gmasta_flash 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Some historians said the invasion of Iraq would lead to WWlll. Now we have a bloody-civil-war that has taken the lives of thousands of innocent people who didn't know Britain and America were conjuring up such a tragic Thesis on WMD's.
2007-04-18 03:56:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Old Man of Coniston!. 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think, that even Cheney gradually understands, that attacking Iran is out of the question.
I so hope for that blood sucking, war mongering, 5 deferment white piece of hot air to disappear forever.
2007-04-18 03:57:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
and have you ever any thought that worldwide conflict ability worldwide conflict, no longer basically 2 small international locations in Asia subsidized via media from distinctive international locations? As for international locations "taking factors" do you incredibly think of it is so undemanding as that? The little fireplace-fights you notice on television from the Iraq conflict are definitely minuscule to what occurred interior the previous wars. super international locations like Russia and the U.S. are not made up of militia, i'm able to assure that. Ever heard of economic gadget? Open your eyes, the worldwide is extra effective than you think of.
2016-11-25 19:33:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
World war three as in a nuclear war?
I doubt it but the new war is terrorism and the loss of your freedom because of it.
Governments like the populace to be afraid it keeps them under control !!!
Big Brother here we come.......
2007-04-18 04:26:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋