lol! Gooood one!
2007-04-17 16:12:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
We know the thought process behind the invasion of Iraq as a part of the "war on terror", considering we were attacked by mostly Saudi nationals and the country that aided in their training etc was Afghanistan, defies logic. So the speculation as to whether this might happen is warranted. The answer however will be no.
2007-04-17 14:32:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by thequeenreigns 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
First off idiots , to the guy who said there is no oil in Mexico where the hell do you think we get most of our oil from? Second off the war in Iraq was justified and it sure as hell was not about oil. Third we are in ROK all ready we have an alliance with them hence why my *** is sitting here. And four when will you teenage liberals grow up move out of your parents basement get off the reefer and stop being such idiots? .... Shadow Stalker
2007-04-17 15:25:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by srtfugitiverecoveryagency 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I guess I'm just going to have to accept the fact that I am in the minority on this site but, this is one liberal (who does not care for this President) who believes that the loss of life, the shattered lives of those who survived, and the fear and grief the student's families are going through as a result of this tragedy are paramount. I find it disgusting and beneath contempt to stoop so low as to try and use these tragic deaths as fodder for political points.
2007-04-17 14:35:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by toff 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
I agree wit T_Mac bush cant even find Mexico on a map to bomb it. Hehehe that is so funny.
2007-04-19 22:24:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by nobodysfool 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush should bomb Mexico just because it's full of Mexicans. Just kidding, that Was bad I know. Sorry no offence just messing around.
2007-04-17 14:33:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kythrol 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Does using the corpses of the VA Tech students to score points on a beaten horse make you happy? I usually try to stay civil in my replies, but you got to admit your point is stretched and your timing is too opportunistic.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AgZp1ExMXKgl8pcfHKceH6nsy6IX?qid=20070417084634AAR83PE&show=7#profile-info-056a1d58c31a7773983990a0f6f88fa9aa
2007-04-17 15:26:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Whootziedude 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Excellent Question.
Keep in mind that Bush is stereo-typical and ignorant, so since he went after another middle-eastern country after 9-11, in this case he'll go after another oriental country. So we're going after Japan.
2007-04-18 00:45:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
N0; he attacked Afganistan where the attackers were headquartered.
If Mexico is harboring a terrorist cell that is killing college students, then I guess we'll see.
2007-04-17 14:31:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by wizjp 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
THERE WAS NO REASON FOR THIS QUESTION. IT IS VERY RUDE OF YOU TO EVEN MENTION THE V.T. STUDENT IF YOU DONT AT LEAST GIVE YOUR CONDOLENCES WHILE DOING IT.
GET OFF THE INTERNET AND GO READY A BOOK BECAUSE ITS OBVIOUS THAT YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THIS WAR!!!
2007-04-17 16:05:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by chitownzfynestwmn 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think we are going back to Vietnam=) It's close to South Korea and a lot of people won't know the difference.
2007-04-17 14:31:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋