What? That makes no sense
Based on your logic, it would make more sense to ask if men who own office buildings are compensating for something. I think you're just placing a weak judgement on people because they do things that you don't do, so therefore there must be something wrong with them.
2007-04-17 06:40:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brandon B 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
What? K.. I'm a girl. My hubby and I own between 6-8 guns. Can't remember for sure, I would have to go to the gun safe to count them. I don't mind having them around, or using them- if they are handled properly and stored the right way.
I drive a big SUV, but not a hummer- although I'm sure it would hold 3 car seats a lot easier then my car does!! And I don't have any male parts, so that pretty much blows that theory out of the water.
I do believe in the right to bear arms, and in a situation where someone was breaking into my home, or threatening my children, you better believe I would use that right!!!
Oh!! And my hubby isn't a small guy- if you get my drift- so you are wrong there too!!
2007-04-17 07:23:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by odd duck 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
How are men who drive hummers? Are they like men who drive hybrids? IGNORANT people try to classify others by their outward appearance. And by the way, there are women who own guns too. I don't think they are trying to compensate for a shortcoming. Classifying people into groups like that really limits who you'll get to know in the future. There are intelligent people all over the place. Don't limit yourself from being able to find them. You lose out by limiting yourself from people who own guns or hummers or hybrids or who are Muslim or Christian or straight or gay or blonde or brunette....
2007-04-17 06:46:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, after waking up at 3am with a black man standing over me and my naked fiancee, I now own a .38 and a 9mm.
Do I drive a Hummer? No. Do I keep my guns in a safe? Yes. Am Im overcompensating? Perhaps - protecting my fiancee is important. Sorry you feel that has something to do with the size of my penis.
2007-04-17 06:41:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Canadian government has made large strides in recovering the Canadian protection stress over the final various years. previous Liberal regimes ran the forces right down to easily approximately no longer something. Chretien in specific held the defense force in low esteem and refused to grant any efficient quantities of money on them. His one 'substantial' purchase became into offering the army with 4 mothballed 2nd hand british subs. everybody who follows the information and Canadian affairs comprehend how that one tuned out. Harper despite the fact that, has taken many steps in recovering the protection stress. Canadian squaddies in Afghanistan case in point are with the fantastic exception of no heavy helicopter features as properly geared up as any squaddies interior the section and are much extra suitable geared up than maximum (which contain the individuals) The airforce has benefited from the acquisition of four new heavy airlift transport planes and a settlement has been signed to substitute the present fleet of C-a hundred thirty medium shipment planes with the latest version of the C-a hundred thirty. New shipboard helicopters are on the thank you to substitute the wiped out old Seakings. The army has in simple terms launched into a substantial existence extension application for the Patrol Frigate. New furnish ships are on the drafting board. there's a marvelous form of artwork to be achieved yet, yet a minimum of issues have began to head interior the the ideal option course. so a approaches as construction our very own warring parties and tanks bypass, you need to comprehend which you do no longer in simple terms throw a wrench at a mechanic and say build this. The analyze and progression component to creating those sort of equipment can value actually billions of greenbacks previously you even connect a wing to a fuselage or establish a gun barrel on a tank without ensures that the tip product would be from now on suitable than what's already available at a decrease fee. What Canada has historically achieved interior the previous is negotiate upkeep and fix agreements with the producer to verify that those activities are gotten smaller to Canadian companies. The CF-18 is a powerful occasion. geared up interior america yet repaired and maintained in Canada.
2016-12-16 08:23:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then I guess the founding fathers of America, who fought the British using their hunting rifles, so you could have the freedom to post stuff like this, were simply insecure because of their penis size. Do you know that the main reason that other countries don't just invade America is because they know that most Americans own guns and aren't afraid to use them? I love the fact that I have the right to bear arms, as guaranteed by the constitution, in this country. I believe it is a freedom worth fighting for, and my cock is 9 inches long. So that theory is pretty f*cking stupid.
2007-04-17 07:06:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Enslavementalitheist 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe everyone should own a gun.
From 18 years old up.
Men and women.
The whackos will go out in the first wave.
The next level of whackos go out in the second wave.
Then people with a thinking mind will realize, if you shoot someone, there are 5 or 6 that are looking at you and might shoot you.
2007-04-17 06:44:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by chris p 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope. They're trying to overcompensate for the lack of a fuzzy fluffy tail.
2007-04-17 06:39:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by WWTSD? 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
No. Most men who own guns have them for hunting or for personal protection.
2007-04-18 05:49:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tony M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I own 4 hummers and 90 rifles!
2007-04-17 06:43:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Fred Phelps 1
·
3⤊
1⤋