All I ever hear about is the problems with Mexicans but they have never been a real problem here. We have had a rather nasty gang of Vietnamese here in Albuquerque…
Now this Cho Seung-Hui a South Korean goes and causes the deadliest mass shooting in US history…
To compound matters the UN wants us to start taking in tens of thousands of Iraqi refugees????
Okay so I know 99.999% of these people are good folks but isn’t time we rethink our Immigration laws?
2007-04-17 04:54:32 · 15 answers · asked by BigBadWolf 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I could not agree more. Yes I believe it is past time to make some real changes. I am not sure what the answer is but it merits immediate attention
2007-04-17 05:04:01 · answer #1 · answered by Becky 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Cho was a legal resident alien! I do not believe he was here illegally! Depending on his status I am not sure if he should have been allowed to own a gun! If Iraqis refugees are allowed to come to this country then they will be legals! The issue with Mexicans is illegal immigration!
2007-04-17 05:03:44 · answer #2 · answered by rose 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are correct 100% There's a smaller percentage
of there population in prison than even "whites"
as for the Iraqis, let them go to Iran. We nor
Iraq could keep a few bad ones out of the green
zone and even out of there parliament. That shooter
in VA. was legal on a student permit. Give me a
few million illegals anytime.
2007-04-17 05:48:20 · answer #3 · answered by wayne g 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well i would have to say that it has nothing to do with our immigration laws but the individuals themselves. We have a whole bunch of nutcases here within the US who have done mass killings or acts of terrorism without them being immigrants (ex: columbine students who tormented their schools is the first that comes to mind). As sad and horrific as this occurrence was, the fact that the shooter was South Korean is irrelevant to the fact that he was a disturbed person.
2007-04-17 05:03:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
there ought to be extra regulations on gun administration! how many extra human beings might desire to die after this! of course what we've isn't adequate! human beings say that it may well be a contravention of the 2d modification, yet unique the founding fathers have been speaking with regard to the protection rigidity and how they have the properly suited to undergo hands to a threat. it wasn't meant that human beings might desire to. and if human beings are going to have weapons then they might desire to might desire to have it visibly shown so human beings understand to be careful. plus why might somebody permit someone who isn't even a citizen (who technically, does not have a similar rights that a citizen does) get a gun. for people who think of that it would merely make issues worse are incorrect. if we limit issues and enforce those regulations, it would desire to discourage human beings from doing the undesirable issues that they do. of course statistics do no longer lie.
2016-12-29 04:23:51 · answer #5 · answered by tammaro 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'll just comment on the Iraqi refugees
as this was an isolated thing that any average american could have done
the problem with taking in Iraqis, is that we can't tell which ones are "good" and which ones want to kill americans
there's a real problem with that
2007-04-17 05:02:41 · answer #6 · answered by retired 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We have been rethinking our immigration laws, but thats about it. When we talk about Illegal iimmigration, we are not referring just to Mexican's, it's ALL illegal immigrants. Cho was here legally and lived in that area for years, so I am not sure what he has to do with this!
2007-04-17 04:59:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It shouldn't. Mr. Cho's success at racking up body count probably owes more to the policies of the school than to his national origin or imigration status, and his decision to go on a rampage was, at this point, aparently entirely personal.
2007-04-17 05:25:21 · answer #8 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
OK I understand but, wouldn't it be better to have striker laws on guns and alert the police when someone buys a mass quantity. Do you thinks immigrants are responsible for only negative things. But those UN refugees didn't ask to be left destitute, Govts have to think about consequences to their actions.
2007-04-17 05:07:48 · answer #9 · answered by Elle 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The VT Case has noting to do with Immigration issues. He came here when he was 8 with his parents. Lived in the suburbs and grew up with other american kids.
2007-04-17 05:01:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋