English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-16 20:48:28 · 13 answers · asked by bigfloyd0 1 in Politics & Government Military

13 answers

Not sure on how many MP's.... but I believe Prince Harry will be serving in Iraq soon, not sure about William. Didn't Prince Andrew also serve in the Falklands conflict?

2007-04-16 22:21:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

probably none, I mean George W Bush was pushed to the top of the list for the Texas Air National Guard 147th Fighter Group in the Vietnam war along with Lloyd Bentsen Jr, John Connally III, James R Bath and seven members of the Dallas Cowboys. Why exactly should our soldiers go to die for the privileged when the privileged hold their own sons out of the danger?

2007-04-17 22:15:28 · answer #2 · answered by vdv_desantnik 6 · 0 0

There are no longer any authentic exorcisms carried out on toddlers. Now the exorcist team issued below the expert order of Vatican comprise 3 people. A Psychiatrist, a psychologist and a clergyman. they are saying now that extra effective than ninety% of the circumstances are psychological issues or take place do to concern. On decrease than 10% demands authentic exorcisms.

2016-11-25 00:27:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Prince William will soon be in Iraq he the only one with a bit of balls.

2007-04-16 21:55:44 · answer #4 · answered by british gurly 3 · 0 0

Saying that the Queens son going to Iraq, oh look, flying pigs, shows that he has balls is incorrect.

It demonstrates that he has no marbles, and that whatever balls he might have, he seems keen as an arsehole to have them blown off.

2007-04-20 04:44:49 · answer #5 · answered by manforallseasons 4 · 0 0

What a silly question. I believe we have a volunteer Army. If the offspring of MPs have not volunteered then they won't be there will they?

2007-04-17 08:56:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i don't know but my guess is NONE but if I'm wrong i apologise in advance//and Mucky it said MPs not royalty and Harry isn't out there yet???

2007-04-17 09:09:55 · answer #7 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 0 0

I would say non they would not risk the lives of THEIR children.

2007-04-17 06:28:54 · answer #8 · answered by Stephen P 4 · 0 0

Nil.

2007-04-17 07:33:27 · answer #9 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 0 0

The queen will come into that cattegory soon.

2007-04-16 21:04:05 · answer #10 · answered by JOHN 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers