If the gunman who killed 32 people was Muslim people call him terrorist but since he is not Muslim may be athiest or Christian or Jew he would be crazy. lol
2007-04-16 20:08:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Pretty girl wether he was a Muslim,Christian,or, Jew this gunman is not only crazy but he is the Devils advocate because killing is the devil's work, Satan was a manslayer when he began(John8:44) and he has not changed his way he is still blinding people to the truth(2Corinthians4:4)God is a God of Love not of hate(1John4:8) And he hates violence, crime and cruelty!
2007-04-17 01:57:24 · answer #1 · answered by I speak Truth 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will just write this again.
Religion is the opium of the masses. If you believe God has planned everything and as man you can't understand God's actions then you just blindly accept.
Don't worry it can't be a Muslim at this point because that would mean the Iraq was was a waste of time and money and did not make the country safer from terrorist.
It is the religious that is most manipulate in this country. What you witnessed is another horrific act that will rally the people to give more of their freedoms away.
If is the same force behind the Oklahoma City bombing, 911, and the war in Iraq.
Problem
Reaction
Solution
Now America you will take in the butt without Vaseline. Lives are expendable to the people that want to take away your freedoms.
2007-04-17 03:18:09 · answer #2 · answered by T-Rex 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was evil and crazy, because he didn't have a political or relgious motive, apparently.
People who are driven by what they perceive as political injustice, which is the case with al-Qaeda irrespective of the fact that they also have a (false) religious ideology, are labelled terrorists by their target group. This is true whether they are are Moslems, Israeli Jews who were labelled terrorists by the British in the 1940s, Basques or any separatist group such as the original suicide bombers, Hindu Tamil Tigers in Buddhist Sri Lanka.
2007-04-17 06:52:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The difference is not a religious thing. The purpose of a terrorist is to create terror of something. The assailant was labeled as "crazy" because he killed himself after the assault. This assailant seems to not have something of which terror could be caused after his death.
2007-04-17 03:21:54 · answer #4 · answered by herg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just hope Jack Thompson isn't able to go into parasite mode and make him an innocent boy corrupted by graphic images... *shudders at the thought*
2007-04-17 03:12:43 · answer #5 · answered by yelxeH 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Pretty girl...your avatar is really pretty! The world is such......they need one scape goat to point finger.
2007-04-17 03:11:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
OH i totally agree... thank you for pointing that out..!
2007-04-17 03:15:37 · answer #7 · answered by Dee 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
the scumbag was crazy, no matter what religion he was
2007-04-17 03:13:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
people action can't be categorized by his religion.
it is not affairs...
2007-04-17 03:11:05 · answer #9 · answered by roy_marzoed 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You hit is right girl !!!
2007-04-17 03:22:01 · answer #10 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋