Because air bags are a feeble safety device when compared to decent seat belts.
And because in race cars, they want drivers to continue controlling the vehicle (as best they can) after a collision, not be stunned into near unconsciousness by the explosion of an air bag in their face, while their car drifts into the other race cars trying to avoid the accident. Same problem on the street, just this problem is ignored.
Really, air bags are all about the highway safety statistics. Statistically, they save more lives. That's true. But a lot of the lives they save are people who refused to wear seat belts. And while I'm glad they got saved, it's a lie to say air bags can replace seat belts. That's why seat belt use is mandatory in so many states. It's also true air bags injure you, sometimes seriously.
Roll cages are nice... IF you roll over, which most cars on the street do not, and anyway, air bags don't help you AT ALL in a rollover. I'd rather see better seat belts in cars than airbags. 3" wide mesh instead of 2", and 4-point belts (i.e. double shoulder belts).
I don't think consumers will ever accept crotch or helmet straps (much less helmets!) but then, consumers don't drive 180mph :)
2007-04-16 12:38:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wolf Harper 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because with the roll cage, and 6 point harnesses, and the extreme helmets and now neck braces, they are safe enough. Air bags also would weigh the cars down too much and would always go off, causing for either more crashes because of a driver not being able to recover from a minor crash, to a driver loosing because of pit time needed to take it out or put it back it. Air bags are pointless in racing vehicles, they will seriously just end up doing a lot of harm.
2007-04-16 12:44:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by David K 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Research in Europe showed that the velocity needed to deploy an ultra hi-speed air bag for use in racing was to dangerous to use, so more research was put into helmet restraint systems, now known as the HANS Device which is used in most international & national Fia sanctioned events world wide & top American motor sport events.
Formula 1 team McLaren & Mercedes also carried out a lot of research after Mika Hakkinen's crash at the Australian GP in the late 90's & found the system to bulky & dangerous to use in F1 racing.
2007-04-16 13:16:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by endac 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off they are built much better. That's why they cost so much more. The roll cage within the shell is very,very well built.
Second is the seatbelt. The 5 point harness is still today the most effective on the market.
The average consumer car $12,000, The average stock car, quater million and up. Tremendous difference in quality and price.
2007-04-16 12:44:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tyson boy's dad 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well bump and go would be out of the question while racing.If there isn't a accident happening..The air bag would surely make one happen, once you bump the front end hard enough into the guy in front of you...Right?
2007-04-16 12:43:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They have a full roll cage and a 5 point harness instead.
They are better off than if they had an airbag. They have wrecks at a 180 mph and walk away.
2007-04-16 12:41:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fordman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer see how the sensor could constantly be on. The sensor is interior the door physique and in ordinary terms is going off while there is an result from an twist of fate. result=Sensor is going Off=Air luggage launched. as long as you haven't any longer gotten any sort of ailment or bear in mind on your clockspring or clockspring assembly, you should be o.k.. i do no longer see the way it could extremely remember lots. besides, your racing seats are going to have inverted aspects that carry you interior the seat interior the form of a component result.
2016-12-10 03:50:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by wintz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
in high speed impacts airbags are more likely to kill you, and can hinder your excape from a burning or overturned plus most race cars have 3,4 or more point harnesses and roll cages that do a good job of restraining people making airbaggs un-nessicary and dangerous pice of equipment
2007-04-16 12:41:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by j_steele_05 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
because there is simply no space to install them and moreover, the system will take up some weight so it will hinder the velocity. thus they make do with 5 point seat belt system to hold the driver in placed even in a collision. thats why they have to wear helmets!
2007-04-16 12:42:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by mossycheong 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Probably because they are so restrained already they dont need them. They have multi point harnesses, neck restraints, helmets, etc. so an airbag would be pretty much useless.
2007-04-16 12:41:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by skylineDude 1
·
0⤊
0⤋