2007-04-16 12:15:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pets ➔ Cats
nope, bacteria are actually the lowest forms of life. Viruses are alot smaller than bacteria but they are NOT living so they arn't the lowest form of life.
2007-04-16 13:09:30 · answer #1 · answered by wenchgirl04 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no not necessarly there isnt really a clear definition of the lowest form of life.. of course some people may have in their opinion it is but personally i think cockroaches are grosser and are the lowest form of life.. mice are actually very smart and cute i think
2007-04-16 19:28:45 · answer #2 · answered by chelsey 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you kidding me, there are a thousand lower life forms, and most of them post on these boards!
Chalice
What about amoeba and single-celled organisms. What about bacteria and viruses - simple but deadly. What about mosquitoes, fleas and all the other horrible parasites that don't seem to contribute anything to the circle of life.
2007-04-16 19:24:28 · answer #3 · answered by Chalice 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Dubyah Bush JR.
2007-04-17 04:05:58 · answer #4 · answered by d_ott_1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mouse on my computer is not. The mouse in my house is they Carrie all kinds of germs.
2007-04-16 19:29:43 · answer #5 · answered by larry B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. If they were, would people have mouse pets? Anyways, germs, worms, and many other things are a lot lower.
2007-04-16 20:07:06 · answer #6 · answered by alexareed10 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, politicians.
2007-04-16 19:24:51 · answer #7 · answered by irishman 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Far from.
2007-04-16 19:41:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i think worms are
2007-04-16 19:20:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-04-16 19:21:29 · answer #10 · answered by D-man 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋