just wandering how many will be mislead, fooled into a mark!
2007-04-16 09:38:38 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Forget the "mark" idea.
Personal privacy would be invaded in a HUGE way.
2007-04-16 09:41:26 · answer #1 · answered by <><><> 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well? They put chips in animals so if they run away, and get caught, then when the catcher returns to the pound, and if the animal has a chip, the owners would be contacted of their lost pet.
Now if the same idea was applied to humans or children, when a child is kidnapped tracking equipment (towers, or satellite tracking) would help police find the missing child, I wouldn't mine for my children's sake
2007-04-16 09:52:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I easily disagree with an implanted chip, yet I do think of that comparable technologies has its place. My husband's cousin has Down syndrome, and while she grew to become into approximately 9 the police chanced on her wandering down the line in merely her pajamas interior the midst of iciness. She had long previous to discover her mom, who'd long previous on a walk, and her dad did no longer hear her pass away the domicile. They offered a GPS look ahead to her to placed on. It had a lock so she could no longer get it off. regrettably, they examined it, and the organization grew to become into no longer able to discover the watch on their equipment, so that they back it. i think of something like it extremely is a great theory, nevertheless, particularly for taking your newborn to crowded locations such because of the fact the mall or an entertainment park. The chip does sound very apocalyptic to me nevertheless!
2016-12-29 17:19:09 · answer #3 · answered by kash 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would absolutely put one in my child as long as they were always aware that they had it, and could choose to have it removed. I would not agree with something like that being mandatory. I would do anything that could potentially save my child's life. I'm not big on enormous conspiracy theories. I don't think the government is all that interested in knowing what every single, average, boring person is doing at every moment. I don't think they really care if you're cheating on your spouse or are at a strip club. Thinking of it as some Huge, big-brother style invasion of privacy seems a little dramatic to me.
2007-04-16 09:49:41 · answer #4 · answered by Jess H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we are here during the last half of the tribulation,I would not accept a mark,chip,or tattoo. Mike and Joel would just have to make me a new head.
2007-04-16 09:54:08 · answer #5 · answered by bonsai bobby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a micro chip? sure as long as it doesnt have to go in My hand or My forehead... cuz those two places its the mark of the beast if it can go elsewhere to then it isnt the mark
2007-04-16 09:48:22 · answer #6 · answered by Pastor Biker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not willingly do it; however, it could easily be slipped in on a Dr or hospital visit. The other thing you should be worried about is a possible mental jack to the world wide web.
2007-04-16 09:43:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, never. The gov. already knows more about me than I would ever want them to know. What about RFID chips in the things we buy??? Scary!
2007-04-16 09:44:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not the Mark of the Beast untill you have to Deny Jesus to get it.
Other than that, there are Pro.'s and Con.'s.
Ditto....
2007-04-16 10:20:25 · answer #9 · answered by maguyver727 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
Do you really believe that a microchip is the end product of some satanic endeavor to rule the world? Really?
2007-04-16 09:41:52 · answer #10 · answered by Samurai Jack 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋