There is very little difference in their teachings. They basically teach the exact same thing: to be a good person, to help others, and to love everyone.
2007-04-16 06:27:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Buddha-nature might be better described as Buddha-potential. We all have the same potential to become Buddhas but it takes a great deal of concerted effort and a definite wish. Buddhahood is a result and it necessarily has causes. This could best be summed up by saying that you need the two collections of method and wisdom, or merit and wisdom, to produce the truth and form bodies of a Buddha.
I can't really speak to the topic of Christ Nature except maybe to say that if you want to follow Jesus you should try and be (like) Jesus (was.) I'm sorry I can't help you more with that aspect of your question.
2007-04-19 09:37:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by shrill alarmist, I'm sure 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not necessarily. The Ten Commandments is a list of things that are permitted from the Christian faith, and if you follow this and are a good person, then when you die you can go to Heaven. The Eightfold Path are more....requirements in order to reach enlightenment. So they're parallel as far as you must follow them in order to reach enlightenment or Heaven, but different in that one is a list that you're supposed to abstain from and the other you're supposed to live out.
2007-04-16 06:38:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by greendayrockgods 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christ Nature= God nature
Buddha Nature= Beyond God/Nirvanic nature
Yes, they both taught universal love and peace and some similarities but with different understandings.
Okay okay, I won't write anything too lengthy or anything else. I hope the above description helps.
2007-04-18 23:43:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are definitely similarities between Christianity and Buddhism.
The biggest difference is that Buddha is often considered a "dead beat dad" since he left his wife and children to seek out enlightenment.
Jesus claimed to be God in the flesh, and is the only one in history where there is accounts of rising from the dead.
From these backgrounds, I'd say the nature of Christ is more impressive and worthy if true.
2007-04-16 06:32:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Thich Nhat Hanh wrote an excellent book called Living Buddha, Living christ, where he basically stated the idea of christ nature and buddha nature are the same thing. He points out numerous parallels between the messages of both the buddha, and of jesus of nazareth.
This is a great book here is what parallax press says about it.
Living Buddha, Living Christ
Thich Nhat Hanh
"I find myself agreeing with Thich Nhat Hanh at nearly every significant turn of Living Buddha, Living Christ. His book presents an opportune moment to deepen our understanding." — Elaine Pagels
"Thich Nhat Hanh's words entered me like a Zen koan: Speak to me of the unspeakable. Speak to me of God! His words offer us the challenge to come alive, truly alive." — Brother David Steindl-Rast, O.S.B.
Buddha and Christ, perhaps the two most pivotal figures in the history of humankind, each left behind a legacy of teachings and practices that have shaped the lives of billions of people over the course of two millennia.
Thich Nhat Hanh has been part of a decades-long dialogue between these two great living contemplative traditions. Thich Nhat Hanh witnessed persecution of Buddhists under the Catholic governments of South Vietnam. He was also befriended by Christian leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., and Thomas Merton. It was these friends who introduced him to the deepest truths of Christianity.
In Living Buddha, Living Christ, Nhat Hanh sets out for the first time, his understanding of Jesus Christ and the inspiration he finds in the Gospels. With a lightness of touch only an outsider can bring, Thich Nhat Hanh depicts the joyful, contemplative heart at the center of the Christian tradition. Thich Nhat Hanh responds to the Pope's recent remarks on Buddhism while laying out his own hopeful vision of the common purpose shared by these two great world religions. From Riverhead Books.
One of the depressing moments will be when the zealots come out and bash buddhism because they are so wrapped up in their own "brand" of christianity, they cannot see anything else. It is too bad, because thich nhat hanh was trying to bridge the gap.
And I love how people who are uninformed about buddhism will make generalities.
(the buddha abandoned his family, but jesus rose from the grave.... etc....)
2007-04-16 06:29:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Adorabilly 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Buddha is not what is, but he who was. Being is sentient. A breath of follicles nurturing past the grave. Give nothing to the student but in all things pass grief like a ten foot gorilla...Amen, Jesus.
2007-04-16 06:30:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Thomas Paine 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
expensive Sirius, i'm in awe. I even have appeared at a lot of your previous solutions and located them to be strategies-blowing. The clearness, the phraseology, the expounded strategies are so nicely reported that i'm surprised you haven't any longer garnered a plenty extra advantageous following. Your strategies are as crystal sparkling as perhaps, Mary Baker Eddy, or Pat Rodegast channeling Emmanuel. they seem to be a excitement to study. in many situations, as quickly as I see your answer I say" nicely there is no longer something left for me to declare." yet I do besides. Now your question has elicited many high quality solutions. it incredibly is one component to observe of the solutions on your questions and think of all of us understand the solutions. yet is is extremely distinctive to attempt to stay in an awakened state. Emmanuel defined it this way " The strategies isn't super sufficient to understand the limitless. the heart is." i think of the assumption of earth as a college domicile has plenty validity. We seem to develop from grade to grade with each existence experience. as quickly as we are crammed with fears and superstitions we are nevertheless in the decrease grades and experience gentle there. We seem to evoke extra each time we develop in college. And jointly as we are all able to total awakening at any time, many are overwealmed via too plenty substitute. So we hold close directly to the previous innovations which incredibly have not served us nicely. awaken we would desire to. it incredibly is God's will. Failure isn't an determination.
2016-10-22 07:57:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus placed all religious authority upon himself. He prophecied his own death and resurrection. Buddha didn't want to claim any dort of divinity, but it was placed upon him after many years. Jesus claimed divinity from the outset.
Jesus's nature was that of God and man. Sinless man and powerful authoritative God. he was from a divine place, and became a kinsman redeemer for all mankind. Trust in God was a part of His message. Sin was countered by His sacrifice, and claimed by faith in Him.
To me, none of that sounds like Buddha.
2007-04-16 06:41:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus was God and Jesus rose from the dead!
Buddah is still in the grave.
2007-04-16 06:29:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋