2007-04-16 03:55:18 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It suckes, eh. Here there's only one religion channel.
2007-04-16 03:58:42 · answer #1 · answered by -♦One-♦-Love♦- 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Would you prefer to have 20 Christian channels, 20 Muslim channels, 20 Jewish channels, 20 Wiccan channels, 20 Scientology channels, 20 Buddhist channels, 20 Hindu channels, 20 Shaman channels, 20 NeoPagan channels, 20 Atheist channels, 20 Agnostic channels and 20 secular channels and then offer all of that in every language on Earth?
Why don't you run your own cable network and then you can show whatever programs you wish.
2007-04-16 12:49:26 · answer #2 · answered by Unity 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And by "4 religious channels" you mean all christian right? Where's the equality in that!
2007-04-16 13:07:57 · answer #3 · answered by bob888 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pat Robertson = 25 secular channels all by himself.
2007-04-16 11:02:21 · answer #4 · answered by Samurai Jack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There isn't enough information in all of religion to make 60 channels that could run continuously. I'm surprised that your area can even make 4.
2007-04-16 11:00:46 · answer #5 · answered by John F 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a wonder the religious channels aren't pay per view yet to get even more money out of them
2007-04-16 11:01:17 · answer #6 · answered by Sir Reginald Whiskers 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Secularism runs the world.
2007-04-16 11:00:47 · answer #7 · answered by kitty21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Religious channels are a lot more entertaining too. God is love. Love isn't jealous. God is jealous. Watching a christian preacher explain that is excellent!
2007-04-16 11:00:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apparently most of the audience is more interested in things other than religious nonsense.
2007-04-16 11:02:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's 4 too many.
2007-04-16 11:00:24 · answer #10 · answered by michael k 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋