The die-hard religous question everyone wants to ask....The original trilogy or the prequel? Which is superior?
I like both, I dunno. Anakin is a pansy retard who has troubles looking angry (he comes across as a grounded teenager) but besides that it's all good.
What's wrong with Jar Jar?
2007-04-15 06:09:38 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
zen, Tao
2007-04-15 06:13:14 · answer #1 · answered by kramaster 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The new trilogy could have been so much more.
The flaws were:
Jar Jar (what was wrong?) Some said he was a racial stereotype, also his humor was so forced it did not fit in.
Anakin, the acting was wooden, and after he killed children, how do you go back?
What I liked though was the the third of the new trilogy when Ben is told his life is over, he has to hang in the desert and wait for that Luke brat to grow up and the only comfort he will have is talking to the ghost of his own mentor, this is after having to destroy his own apprentice. How much he gave for what he believed in.
2007-04-15 15:54:10 · answer #2 · answered by mitchell2020 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ewan Mgreggor can't act. Starwars needs Hans solo. So I would say, the later ones, but whilst Yoda is still alive.
I do like it when Yoda fights tho.
2007-04-15 13:15:01 · answer #3 · answered by Zen禅Maiden :ジェダイ 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes like in the film human traffic
2007-04-15 13:12:41 · answer #4 · answered by gasp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋