God created the earth and everything in it through spontaneous generation. He simply said . . . "Let it be" and BOOM! - there it was : )
2007-04-14 15:23:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Me2 2
·
2⤊
6⤋
The belief in the science of evolution has nothing to do with spontaneous generation. It's the study of how life developed.
The origin of life remains very much a mystery, but biochemists have learned about how primitive nucleic acids, amino acids and other building blocks of life could have formed and organized themselves into self-replicating, self-sustaining units, laying the foundation for cellular biochemistry.
Creationists sometimes try to invalidate all of evolution by pointing to science's current inability to explain the origin of life. But even if life on earth turned out to have a nonevolutionary origin (for instance, if aliens introduced the first cells billions of years ago), evolution since then would be robustly confirmed by countless microevolutionary and macroevolutionary studies.
2007-04-14 15:21:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Although spontaneous generation is not common, it appears that all life on Earth originated from a "spontaneous" process requiring hundreds of millions of years.
Pasteur demonstrated that life does not arise in a volume of tens of liters in a period of weeks.
2007-04-14 15:31:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Which is more likely the formation of a simple self reproducing RNA strand out of existing chemicals or an infinitely complex creator God from nothing? When was the last time you saw an infinitely complex god spontaneously generate?
In an infinite ergodic multiverse life will form eventually no matter how unlikely.
2007-04-14 15:28:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nobody knows for sure how life originated. Sometime in the future we might though.
Spontaneus generation have nothing to do with what most scientists today believe, and most people who ask these kind of questions know it.
What do I think originated life? God. And i think in the future will have a glimpse on how he did it (the way we have today with evolution and the big bang)
2007-04-14 15:25:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Emiliano M. 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
>>based on the information, the spontaneous technology of existence theory seems extra valuable to in good shape the area of technology fiction than medical actuality.<< Bullshit. no one accepts abiogenesis as "medical actuality" in spite of the undeniable fact that this is nonetheless the suitable attainable clarification. basically an fool fills the gaps in medical awareness with magic contained in certainly one of those a incredible being. heavily? this is the suitable you may furnish? So unhappy. Edited to characteristic: You mentioned: >>@court:"EVOLUTION is a medical actuality...considering that no one substitute into THERE a million years in the past to visual show unit the 1st abiogenesis, that maintains to be a theory." Make your recommendations up. A actuality or a theory?<< you're the two stupid or cheating. Evolution and abiogenesis are no longer the same element. the former deals with what occurred after existence substitute into formed, and the latter deals with how existence initially began. As court properly mentioned, evolution is shown medical actuality on the same time as abiogenesis remains theory. Do you have a extra valuable theory?
2016-11-24 19:04:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to go back a bit further than earth history. Do a little research. Check out William Day's (Chemist) work on the subject if you think physicists are on the wrong track regarding the Big Bang or M Theory.
2007-04-14 15:28:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by MysticMaze 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well not under normal circumstances and the chemistry is all wrong now. But we have pieced together most of the chemistry that led to life. It is true that we haven't put it all together YET. But not knowing doesn't mean that it is unknowable.
It is no more evidence for a god that illness was evidence of demonic possession (which is where the Bible led) was when we didn't know about germs.
2007-04-14 15:20:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think life may have started out spontaneous but then had help by God and in some cases aliens.
2007-04-14 15:27:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pantherempress 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
How about this. Did you know that religion was based on being scared of something that was unexplainable so people had to come up with something to classify its existence and they gave it a name , its called a miracle and man has always been scared of the unknown so we were taught to be scared into submit ion by religion and thus hevan and hell was created and ever since crap went down hill . read between the lines about our history of religion
2007-04-14 15:33:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by brians.furniture 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well you see there was this old guy with a white beard and robes who decided he was lonely so he made some toys that he could put in competition to see if they can win the prize.
2007-04-14 15:21:32
·
answer #11
·
answered by crct2004 6
·
3⤊
1⤋