True or False.Government should subsidize pregnant mothers for the first two years to ensure healthy citizens?

Answer 1

This is part of the health-care package of many countries, and also a part of their provincial and federal programs.
The funding is going to a good cause; proper medical care for the most vulnerable persons in our society, proper nutrition and parenting classes, etc.
It saves far more money than it costs, because the children have a better chance to be healthy and happy students in school. The parents have resources instead of parenting by trial-and-error, and many problems are prevented.
Proactive is better than reactive.

Answer 2

Since this is in the immigration section...NO!!!

I'm for subsidizing ONE thing as it concerns pregnancy. Make it difficult.

There is an approved birth-control injection that lasts a year. One shot, one FULL year.

The population stayed under 300 million for all of recorded history until the renaissance.

In 1650 it hit 500 million for the first time. That's .5 billion.

In 1836, one BILLION.
In 1932, TWO BILLION.
In 1964, THREE BILLION.
In 1976, FOUR BILLION.
In 1988 (or thereabouts), FIVE BILLION!
In 1998, SIX BILLION!!

Today, because of fertilizers (petroleum bi-products) and huge tractors (which run on petroleum), we have hit nearly SEVEN BILLION (6,700,000,000+ people).

That population lives on an artificial food supply. If oil hit $500 a barrel tomorrow, starvation would begin in numbers we've never seen in our lifetime.

If we are to avoid a Malthusian catastrophe, we'd best start penalizing people for making little people they can't afford (on their own income) to support and prepare for a tough job market.

We should and must reward people for waiting until 30 or over to have a child and reward them even more for having none.



qwerty

Answer 3

it is going to take place. don't be fooled! it is going to start up at some point, and proceed on from there! My daughter substitute into certainly one of those reliable infant appropriate up until perchance a month after her 2d b-day now i'm getting temper tantrums exceptionally much each and every day, and crying fits over stupid issues. One minute she's terrible and the subsequent minute she's relatively candy. Its in simple terms an component of existence. yet i theory i does no longer could bypass via it the two and now i'm pulling my hair out! reliable success!

Answer 4

True. Every child should be treated as an asset to it's country - because in the future most will pay back much more than they ever received. Why should mothers be forced to go out and work all hours just so they can afford to pay other people take care of their babies? It's unfair and makes no sense at all.

We should definitely put more value upon the job that they do during those precious early years. Raising children is one of the most important jobs that a person can ever do in this world, we should never forget that. :-)

Answer 5

Since you are in the "Immigration" section, I will answer accordingly.
Our government should never "subsidize" any pregnant illegal aliens, nor any illegal alien mothers, ever.
Illegal alien pregnant women and mothers should be deported, as designated by United States federal law.

Now as to citizens, and legal immigrants.
Every baby has a daddy.
It is the responsibility of the babies parents to support the baby, it is not MY respsonsibility to "subsidize" every pregnant bimbo who forgot to use birth control, or every baby that results.

Just what to you think the "government" is? The big baby-daddy of all of us?
The money which the "government has comes out of MY pocket, and every other taxpayers pocket, it is TAX money, and I work hard for mine, and I do NOT want my hard earned tax money to go to any parents who are so irresponsible that they have a baby when they CAN'T AFFORD ONE.

Use birth control, don't get pregnant, and wait to have a baby when you can afford it.

Answer 6

False, think about this; women in the ghetto has 18 kids, hasn't worked in years!! people should not become dependent on their servant government.

Answer 7

It's not a true or false question. It's a question of what you value and what standards you think should apply.

Personally, I oppose all forms of government subsidies. People should be responsible for their own lives.

If people want to participate in group charities to provide such assistance, god bless them. But the govt should not force people to support mandatory govt-run charities.

Answer 8

Why would we want to remove 16years of subsidies?

Eighteen right now apdc?

Answer 9

False. Why should we pay women to be pregnant? Wait, maybe you are on to something. How much?

Answer 10

False. That is what husbands are for. If they are pregnant and have no husband, that is what abortions are for.