English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Since I don't live in Iraq, and didn't live in Iraq prior to the U.S. Invasion, I would say that you need to listen to the people who live there now, and see how many of their family used to be alive prior to our invading Iraq, to so called save them. Based on the interviews with the actual people who have to walk thru the destruction, in order to go to school, work, get food, or whatever eles they need, and call it a good day if they are alive at the end of it, they don't sound like we did them any favors. They seem to think that, although Sadaam killed people at random, there was a method to his madness, and if you were smart, you could keep yourself and your family alive. However, now, the bombing doesn't discriminate as to who is being killed, there doesn't have to be a why anymore. It's just an accepted part of day to day life. How many people in your family made it home alive today, how many neighbors are intact? Where do we live today, cause our home was blown up, and people are hiding behind the rubble that used to be our bedrooms, shooting at each other. How is my child going to make it in this world with only one arm and half a face? How do I get work with no legs to walk there? Why did they have to kill my mother and father, and set fire to they're broken body right in front of us kids, will I ever remember my parents without seeing that gruesome scene in my mind? Are they happier now that we made Iraq attractive to more murderers so they can penetrate their country, and now they don't have to worry about the guys dressed in black, and the man who controls them, no, now they only have to worry about the guy they run into on the street, or who passes by them in a vehicle, each could be carrying a bomb, waiting to turn their worlds upside down. And they don't seem real happy about the fact that our President doesn't ever want to leave their country alone, no, I'm sure they believe that his mission is to see every poor Iraqi, who can't offer him money, oil or favors, dead, cause they are useless to him, and he is going to need a place to stay, after he's done being President, there will no longer be secret service to protect him, or Air Force One to transport his butt from point A to point B in the luxury and confort he is accustomed to, knowing he has the best security taxpayer dollars can buy. No more planes to police the skies he's walking under, and he won't have the clout to demand a No Fly Zone where ever he is going to be anymore. So, he needs a place to stay, he needs a place to house the people who have faithfully allowed him to rape a Nation, without any trouble at all. Why do you think the palaces over in Iraq are being restored, why are they building palaces over in Iraq? All he needs now is a country free of people who don't want him in it, and there's where our military comes into play. So, no, I don't see the people of Iraq happier now, I didn't see them as very happy before, but now they are beyond miserable.

2007-04-14 13:40:44 · answer #1 · answered by Coulterbasher01 4 · 0 0

He didn't do either illegally ! Congress approved the Iraq attacks as well as the majority of American at that time ! The security people in congress also knew and approved the interrogations techniques used, they where 33 briefings on the subject as a matter of fact ! Just because Nancy Pelosi is claiming she doesn't recall doesn't mean it didn't happen ! She just thinks that the liberals are stupid enough to believe her line of crap and she can try to nail someone else ! this administration is reading the rules different than the lawyers and congress did in the last administration did, you don't change the rules after the game is played ! Bush did nothing wrong ! Move on and worry where Obama is leading us ! Paul, Obama has a history of destroying the opposition that is how he got elected in Illinois, one of there old Chicago tricks !

2016-05-20 00:58:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Civilians have always suffered -- either in war, or in acts of terrorism. That fact is part of thousands of years of history.

And if you think civilians were not bombed in their homes prior to 2002, ask the British during WW2, or the Israelis any time in the past 50 years.

2007-04-14 12:47:53 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 0

Women were stoned in the street. People were imprisoned and tortured. Yep! They were happier before they had schools, hospitals, and utilities which the USA and allies helped build.

2007-04-14 13:51:32 · answer #4 · answered by Gunny Bill 3 · 0 0

There are crazy terroist that want every one who is not a muslum dead. The have killed hundreads of thousands of people around the world. Thank you terroist for killing the inocent.

2007-04-14 14:09:53 · answer #5 · answered by Bob 2 · 0 0

That's true the were just shot at trying to protect the Kurds and Blown up at work.

2007-04-14 12:49:06 · answer #6 · answered by Luchador 4 · 3 0

It seems that Saddam was doing the right thing to keep the peace by killing anyone that did not like him. Dead people do not complain.

2007-04-14 13:04:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Instead they were shot in soccer fields as a form as entertaiment.

2007-04-14 12:52:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

the only people better off in iraq are the kurds and it looks like turkey is about to get all up in that a##

2007-04-14 12:49:32 · answer #9 · answered by sasuke 4 · 0 2

You are probably right. They were being gassed instead, or drug out and put though the shredder, or just shot, or tortured and shot.

2007-04-14 12:53:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers