Do the needs of the many(legal citizens) outweigh the needs of the few?

Answer 1

I think Gene Roddenberry is a political genius. I strongly believe in the Prime directive (Not interferring with the development of foreign culture). I was amazed at his ability to predict the fall of the Soviet Union. Even "Spock was amazed." He stole the line you quoted from somewhere else though.
Make sense, but That can be used the otherway around. THere is about what 6 billion Humans and 300 million Americans. CHina and India would be dragging us down in that theory.

Illegal immigration as well as legal does alter cultures in foreign country. WHen they return they bring back Americana. I read several articles on how we deport illegal immigrants and it changes their homeland for the worse. DOn't attack me on this , I'm just paraphrasing what the LA Times said. When deporting Mexicans back they bring back drugs, a different work ethic, and an even worse attitude towards woman. In El Salvador, the deported brings back LA gang culture. Use the Prime directive in your arguement against illegal immigration. Brag how the VUlcans were all legal. TEll everyone we need a neutral zone just like with the ROmulans. We don't want anymore Ferengis here. We all know how greedy they are and try to rape our land.

Answer 2

I'm now not even rather certain what this implies. We all have demands and this more often than not outweighs all else. Regardless of whether or not we're one with the few or the various. Furthermore, once we are thirsty and I have one bottle of water, I have a tendency to the few: If I have one hundred bottles of water I have a tendency to the various. If I am left with a option in "saving", I don't deal with their "demands" I deal with the hindrance. I feel that too most of the time we attempt to have a tendency to the demands of the various once we don't have the assets and accordingly, have a tendency to none. When we must have simply tended to the few.

Answer 3

Of course. In fact the needs of a few legal citizens outweigh the needs of many illegal aliens.

Answer 4

Generally, that's how most communities work. The needs of the many are more important than the needs of the few.

But that really only applies when there is a choice between where to allocate resources, and where the choice either is to benefit a few or to benefit many.

Most immigration-related debates don't involve that issue.

Answer 5

the needs of a legal citizen should always trump those of illegals

Answer 6

When the many built the field and pay the bills it sure does.