English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just out of curiosity, What do the living cells evlove into at the end of nine months or less.


Thank You to those who answered part one

2007-04-14 10:43:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I did not specify due to the facts that most only see the fetus as a clump of cells and nothing more

2007-04-14 10:48:37 · update #1

Ah, so it is more than just a Clump of Cells

Thanks to all

2007-04-14 10:50:47 · update #2

evlove-to produce by natural evolutionary processes
I know what it means, what I'm trying to get across is that a fetus is more than just a mere clump of cells. With the answers that I have got, it proves that people feel that a fetus is infact more than a clump of cells

thank you to all who took the time to answer

2007-04-14 10:57:02 · update #3

16 answers

Natural growth and development is not the same as evolution.

But I think the answer you are looking for is a baby. A baby that will continue to develop into and fulling grown human, then an old person, then a dead person.

The Bible teaches that killing a person is a serious sin. A fetus?...not so much.

“If men harm a woman with child so that here fruit depart her…they should pay a fine as determined by a judge.” Exodus 21:22 KJV

2007-04-14 10:55:36 · answer #1 · answered by Honest Opinion 5 · 2 0

It's a fetus. It doesn't "evolve", it develops.

Unless it's like, an X-Man or something. I suppose they evolve, since they're mutants.

You might want to check your terms--evolution doesn't apply to an individual (it's mutations over time) and it certainly doesn't apply to reproduction.

That's just the process of sexual cells combining in a favorable environment and growing up. Before it's fully developed, it's stem cells or an embryo or whatever. Tissue. Leaving out the whole "soul" issue, it's not really a viable human body until it's developed to a certain point, which is why premature babies are so devilishly hard to take care of and run up millions in hospital bills.

So women should take their vitamins and get good prenatal care and don't smoke and all that.

2007-04-14 17:49:41 · answer #2 · answered by SlowClap 6 · 2 1

I believe in evolution but I don't believe in abortion. To answer your question giving birth is not evolution. The living sells do not evolve into a different creature. Only slight changes take place in each birth. Some of those changes might remain in future generations some may result in an improvement to the species. It would be a very unlikely that enough chances would occur over the years that it would create a separate species. But it does happen. That's why we have a common ancestor with the Chimp say hello to your cousin the next time you visit the zoo.

2007-04-14 17:57:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

"the" living cells? of the mother? her doctor? her pet shih tzu?

If "they" are going to evolve in the space of nine months or less "they" will have to be extremely simple, with an incredibly short gestation period and lifespan. A yeast could maybe evolve into a different species of yeast. So could a bacteria. They'd still be yeasts and bacteria but different species. Where you going with this? I sense some real disingenuousness going on.

I missed part one, was it any good?

2007-04-14 17:51:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Well firstly, the cells don't "evolve," they grow and develop. Evolution is a process which takes place over thousands of years.

2007-04-14 17:49:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

It's disingenuous to associate the two.

And a fetus doesn't evolve, it gestates.

2007-04-14 17:46:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Nothing. They develop into a baby.

2007-04-14 17:45:45 · answer #7 · answered by Squishy Khrysorrhapis 2 · 6 0

this process is called gestation not evolution.
evolution takes place over thousands of years and i think my wife would have already killed me for getting her pregnant, if her pregnancy would have lasted thousands of years.

2007-04-14 17:46:52 · answer #8 · answered by Jose G 3 · 4 2

what. evolution took thousands and thousand of years to happen.

go to museum

take biology

stop thinking in the box...please!!!

2007-04-14 17:47:54 · answer #9 · answered by kramaster 5 · 5 2

You are obviously confused about the difference between gestation and evolution.

2007-04-14 17:45:56 · answer #10 · answered by dorothea_swann 4 · 8 3

fedest.com, questions and answers