As it turned out, the reports of cold fusion were a false alarm. Too bad, too!.
There was a lot of arugement and controversy--but the bottom line is that no one was able to reproduce the results the scientists (Ponds and Fleishman) claimed. No one thinks they were lying--they just made a mistake.
But--there may yet be something come out of this whole incident (and some good scientists are still looking at this). Not cold fusion (as it turns out, whatever the scientists thought they sayw, it wan't that). But there is a lot of evidence from various scientist s that suggests there was SOMETHING. But so far, while there are a lot of theories, no one has nailed this down yet (and it might be decades before anyone does).
PS--the reason why we do know that whatever is there (assuming something is) its not CF, is that any type of fusion (cold or otherwise) has to produce certain types of radiation. And no one has ever seen that radiation signature in any of the experiments. So (again, asssuming there is really something there) whatever it is, its some other phenomenon
2007-04-14 09:07:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The original reports about "cold fusion" were supposed to be the results of an electrochemical reaction. Reproduction of the results was not successful. The reasons for this are conjecture at best. In general, electrochemical processes are often very dependent on the electrode surface (textures and the like). Many electrochemical processes are hard to reproduce because the electrode surfaces are difficult to reproduce.
2016-05-19 23:49:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are people right now working on fusion and cold fusion. The cold fusion that came to light a few years back was a hoax or just wrong (which can be debated)
other than that yes fusion could provide us with polution free power
of course you have the minor problem that if you had a containment breach you would mealt a hole to the center of the earth with the heat (1 mill degrees C +)
2007-04-14 08:55:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by zspace101 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
The theory of cold fusion never actually worked. The water in the gas tank sounds more like the hydrogen car, however the hydrogen car uses hydrogen and water is the exhaust. Very few hydrogen cars actually exist, they are still very expensive to build.
2007-04-14 09:01:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by blueice 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Politics
Politics
Politics
Think about it, oil is a commodity of value and taxability. Even if you could run a car on water, I doubt a government would make use of it. It's not impossible to run a car on water, being an environmentalist is a weaker priority in governments eyes at this moment of time
2007-04-14 08:57:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by the khemist 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Cold fusion is, sadly, impossible. The experiment that was used to "prove" it was never repeated, despite many attempts.
2007-04-14 08:52:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brian L 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sounds like just the job for you ,GOOD LUCK
2007-04-14 09:17:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by JOHNNIE B 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was a scam.
2007-04-14 08:57:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋