How would you describe the Miller beer?

Question

How does it taste? Is it special not very interesting? Relatively cheap? Or expensive? What do you think of it?

Answer 1

it's pretty light and has a chemical taste to it. Isn't worth the money.

Answer 2

I'll occasionally drink a Miller, although I prefer something a little heartier as a rule.

Miller's an OK beer. Not great. It's a pilsner, so it has very little "body" to it, and no aftertaste. But it's mildly hoppy, slightly tart, and (I think) pretty refreshing when it's ice-cold.

It's priced pretty competitively, versus other mainstream beers in the USA (such as Budweiser). Compared to microbrews and imports, I would call it "cheap", but I mean that mainly in the sense of price, not quality.

Answer 3

Very light bodied, relatively flavorless beer. Good for drinking after mowing the lawn at best.

Answer 4

typical mass produced American-style lager... i.e. watery. It's cheap and tastes like crap. try a real beer, like Samuel Adams Lager.

Answer 5

the champagne of beers that's what the bottle says

Answer 6

a very week bittertasting beer.yes it is very cheap.i just dont care for the taste.

Answer 7

I describe it as "not welcome in my refrigerator".....it is relatively cheap, you can get better tasting cheaper beer.

Answer 8

beer all beer tastes like shite