Do Liberals, John Edward`s Supporters In Particular, Feel Upended By Republican Claims Of Cancer?

Question

Tony Snow (Whitehouse spokesman), right after Edward`s claims, and then Fred Thompson....And remember, Rudy had prostate cancer not too long ago as well....Will Rudy`s cancer resurface, at least on the political scene, as yet another blow against John Edward`s ploy to gain America`s sympathy with claims of "cancer within the family"?....then there was the recanting of Edward`s previous claims......Mrs. Edwards is not quite in the predicament the Edwards camp once told us all she was once in..... What do you think ?

hander- You are ignorant..with all due respect.

Brian- I am not a republican...So are you a fool or am I right ?

Map- Do you realize how "PC" you are ? I know I`m right on this one.

Answer 1

John Edwards is so narcissistic. He ought to be ashamed.
Elizabeth confirms the adage "love is blind"

Answer 2

Tony Snow was going in for surgery, and he is the white house press secretary. Why wouldn't the public know? Not a political decision. Fred Thompson let everyone know because he is about to get into the race and wanted to tell people that his cancer is not life threatening, and is in remission. The doctors say he will live a full life. He is just being honest with the people. Rudy announced his when he dropped out on the senate race to have surgery. If Edwards wife feels she is up to the campaign, I say God speed.

Answer 3

Well, I haven't heard any further news on Mrs. Edwards, but I don't know of any situation where recurrence of a cancer is a good thing. And I think that any claim that this is a "ploy" is disingenuous.

I'm of an age where cancer lurks around the corner, waiting for me so it can pounce. I have friends and relatives battling cancer at this moment, including my brother (prostate cancer - recurred a year after prostatectomy, Age 44, and my best friends's dad (prostate cancer - metastecized to the colon and liver), and from this experience, I have to conclude that making political hay out of cancer is the farthest thing from Edwards', Thompson's, or Giuliani's mind.

Answer 4

I don't think that you question is as important at this time.
The 2008 election is still a long distance away.

There are to many current problems such as having a President who supports a dishonest attorney general, the fraud of the 9/11 commission report and the "covert operations" playground in Iraq.

Answer 5

Anything can be perverted into political fodder these days. Cancer is in my opinion is out of bounds. Both circumstances were made public, appropriately. Beyond that, intentional mentioning to of the situation could be construed as a plea for sympathy.

They are both getting the best treatment. Their fate is in Gods hands now.

Answer 6

I do not now feel nor do I think for one moment that anyone has told of their cancer problem so as to get or receive sympathy from voters in the Democratic or the Republican party's.

Answer 7

It feels form of peculiar, to tell the actuality. slightly painful in the initiating, yet no longer horribly so. frequently it in simple terms feels extraordinary, incredibly to have something extremely massive (now, I ask for forgiveness for what's coming, yet you asked for info) moving interior of you like that. After the act, that's organic to sense somewhat awkward around the guy you probably did it with, in simple terms by fact's an intimate act of love. If it is not executed with a guy or woman you rather believe, and except you're an excellent sl*t (which it would not sound such as you're), you're able to be able to locate which you're feeling somewhat violated to have executed such an intimate act with somebody who would not look to take exhilaration in the magnitude of it as much as you do... So my suggestion is to be careful approximately whom you have intercourse with. It looks such as you and your bf have been mutually for awhile... yet nonetheless, it truly is an intimate act, and females tend to attach greater emotion to it than some men. with any luck your bf is the form who knows in simple terms how sacred intercourse is. additionally, you frequently hear approximately human beings asserting that intercourse is honestly super and spectacular and that they desire to do it 4 cases an afternoon... yet truly, incredibly for the girl... Her first time probable heavily isn't that surprising of an journey. except you're rather aroused, in simple terms the actuality this could be your first time will make you extremely nervous and per risk no longer as into the act as you need to have the means to get later down the line, as quickly as you have grown mushy with doing it, the positions, what to expect, etc. So i does no longer anticipate no heavenly journey or something like that your first time... yet those reports will are available due time, later down the line. it form of feels tremendously straightforward that females are not getting aroused as speedy as boys, so that's harder for them to have orgasms than it truly is for the guy. purely a actuality of existence. it gets less difficult with time... And develop right into a greater satisfying journey with, of course, greater journey. desire this enables. :)

Answer 8

The republicans seem to use ANYTHING to make inuendos about. They think they are making points.......but it is only another republican who wouldn't feel sick at this kind of junk!

Answer 9

Very cruel remarks about the Edwards family here.

But then again, you're a Republican , so I shouldn't be surprised.

Answer 10

I can really only say one thing:
badda boom badda bing