2007-04-13 17:55:35 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It's merely Creationist rhetoric. Since they have no science, no evidence, and only lies to make a positive case, they are stuck trying to argue by diminishing evolution by rhetorical means. Their diploma mill degrees don't stand up well arguing against credentialed scientists, so they call them "evolutionists". It is merely a deceit to try to attempt to create an illusion that Creationism is an alternative.
2007-04-13 18:46:11 · answer #1 · answered by novangelis 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Words are not stupid but the theistically infected that use it like it's a derogatory word are.
2007-04-14 02:02:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes, as is evolutionism. They imply that evolution is something other than a scientific theory, which is untrue. "Isms" are often use pejoratively.
2007-04-14 01:08:10 · answer #3 · answered by RabidBunyip 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No stupider than "Gravitationist" or "Relativitist".
So, yeah, pretty stupid.
2007-04-14 01:03:50 · answer #4 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It just doesn't roll off the tounge
2007-04-14 01:11:15 · answer #5 · answered by catbacker 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's an anagram.
2007-04-14 01:06:20 · answer #6 · answered by S K 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it is actually quite clever. : )
2007-04-14 01:04:41 · answer #7 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋