English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

like people said will the bible says he is but wear is his DNA or wear is the cross and wear is the dna of peter john matt and wear is jesus birth records and chrstian people to day are biges hipocrits the world over they make must clots world wide i use be chrstian tell you meet christians iff get what im saying,....

2007-04-13 15:00:22 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

18 answers

Have you saw him ?

2007-04-13 15:02:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Congratulation you have only a 28.13% misspelling rate. And Yahoo even thoughtfully provides a spell checker. And your grammar could use a little help also. But I digress.

There is no DNA for Jesus because a) he is not dead (He is risen, have you not heard) and b) is no longer of this realm (See Ascension).

Peter is buried under St. Peters Basilica (do you think that is a coincidence?) in Vatican City. John is buried in Ephesus where he went after being released from Patmos. And btw is the only one of the 12 that was not martyred. I don’t know off the top of my head where the other disciples are buried.

As to birth records, I think the Dept. of Vital Statistics computer was damaged when the Jerusalem Temple was destroyed. However, I have it on good authority that Jesus was of the House of David (See Matt 1:1-17). And just what would you do with their DNA? What would you compare it to and why? Enquiring minds want to know.

Bottom line here is that Jesus as well as the 12 are all historical figures and are attested to in documents outside of the Bible. You may wish to contest His deity but it is fact that He lived and died as described in the New Testament.

And no, I have no idea what you are saying.

2007-04-13 15:42:25 · answer #2 · answered by John 1:1 4 · 0 0

Well since he rose from the dead there won't be DNA right? There are written records (not just the Bible) from that time that showed that Jesus was a real person. Even Muslims know that Jesus was a real person. They do not believe He was the Son of God though. It's been thousands of years... the cross was wood. You think it'll still be around.
Learn to spell. There is spell check on here you know. It's called faith and that's in every religion.

2007-04-13 15:06:51 · answer #3 · answered by mmatthews000 4 · 1 0

Jesus is very real. No one will ever find His DNA because that would mean that He did not rise. However, He did and no amount of disbelief will ever change that fact! God reveals Himself to those who believe, have accepted Jesus Christ, and have received the Holy Spirit. God is pure Spirit and He only speaks to a spirit. How can anyone really know Jesus is real without the Holy Spirit to communicate it to you? Its like trying to have a long distance telephone call, each person on each end having a phone, but no lines in between to transmit their voices. It won't work. So that is why if your heart is dead set on not believing in God or accepting Jesus then you are at a loss when it comes to knowing or understanding God to any degree.

2007-04-13 15:07:43 · answer #4 · answered by drivn2excelchery 4 · 1 0

what sort of "evidence" do you pick? no count if it truly is historic evidence for Jesus' existence, then look no further than the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. yet those are not the only ingredients that tell of Jesus' existence. a million Corinithians 15 tells of how Jesus died and rose from the lifeless and then looked as though it may over 500 human beings. In Jewish and Greek custom, eyewitness money owed of such issues have been seen to be the ideal type of evidence for some thing. Flavius Josephus in Antiquity of the Jews in e book 18 and financial ruin 3 speaks of Jesus, giving credence to his miracles and teachings. Josephus himself became into no longer a Christian, yet a Jew. people who desire to doubt that Jesus existed could additionally ought to doubt that Tiberius Caesar, the Roman Emporer ar the time, existed. even nonetheless i won't empirically teach that Jesus existed, i will comprehend previous resonable doubt that he did based on the evidence given. it truly is incredibly naive to assert that Jesus did no longer exist as a results of fact there is not any evidence, and if one does, then he should be consistent, and reject evidence for different historic claims such the existence of George Washington.

2016-12-16 05:16:48 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

OK first off I hardly understood most of it, it 'was weird so all.' And for Jesus's DNA where would it be? He died and came back to life, no DNA and it's not like DNA is going to last for over 2000 years. Same with Peter John and Matthiew. And the Cross could have been knocked over due to years and years of wind and sand.

common sense.

also capitalize names of people, and when talking about Jesus or God your supposed to capitalize the 'H' of He.

2007-04-13 15:10:51 · answer #6 · answered by Aurum 5 · 0 0

I get what you're saying but it's not easy. Where were you when Jesus passed out homonyms?

I have no problem believing there lived a man called Jesus of Nazareth, just like I have no problem believing there was an emperor of Rome called Nero. I do have a problem with referring to either of those long-dead persons in the present tense.

2007-04-13 15:05:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Is English your first language? If it is, try to improve it. It's embarrasing that others can learn English but the very people who use it as their native language can't use proper grammer, spelling or punctuation.
There may have been a person named Jesus but no (authenticated) documents have been found in non-Christian texts that mention anyone by that name performing the miracles he was supposed to have done.

2007-04-13 15:12:14 · answer #8 · answered by strpenta 7 · 0 0

If we had His DNA, he wouldn't be the Christ. He was resurrected and acscended to heaven. The body is not here.

I really do not believe you have a historical background. By the way you are asking your questions you seem to be a bit off in your focus.

Just to let you know, they didn't have television back then either.

2007-04-13 15:05:05 · answer #9 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 2 0

Jesus' existence is confirmed not only through the church but 4 different non-Christian sources of the time that in fact a man named Jesus was crucified by pontius pilate.

Actually the biggest hypocrites Ive ever met are the people outside the church that believe in God, but reject his church and refuse to serve him.

2007-04-13 15:17:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Not only is he real and able to save your eternal soul, but, there were historians alive then that wrote not only about him, but the whole beginning of the Church. Josephus was the most notable historian I can think of, you might google him and learn a few things. Also you might take another crack at READING YOUR BIBLE.

2007-04-13 15:05:50 · answer #11 · answered by sandra g 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers