This is a big decision ,,,people were killed,,,trillions of dollars were spent ,,,etc etc etc
2007-04-13 13:44:31 · 20 answers · asked by syndrome702006 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
yes thousand of innasent people were killed for what nothing i think blair and bush should be brought up for umanaterian crimes aganst the people of iraq and making fals allagation and invading their country so my apinon is bush and blair are liers there was no mas wepon of distuction ever found
2007-04-13 14:47:54 · answer #1 · answered by jerrycambridge 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad intelligence does not constitute a false statement. For example, if you watched your neighbor's house for a week straight 24/7 and everyday you saw people carrying what looked like weapons cases and rolled bloody carpets in, but never coming out. Not to mention you've got one of your buddies on the inside letting you know what's in those cases and those rolled up carpets. What would you conclude? Probably that something was amist!! But when you finally decide to due something about it...kick in the door... and stop the crimes you are certain are going on....They've moved everything out when you and your buddy are sleep; over one state...known as Iran. Should you be punished? Because all arrows and fingers pointed to the obvious. Probably not...human intelligence means you have human error.
2007-04-13 14:10:55 · answer #2 · answered by D 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Saddam used weapons of mass destruction on his own people! If 50 people witnessed a man kill a person in the middle of the day would the police be wrong for arresting the man the next day even if they can't find the gun? Of course they wouldn't. We warned Saddam that we were coming in plenty of time for him to get rid of his weapons, but even if he didn't have them, he said he did. That is enough! end of story! move on! The fact that we are still being attacked over there is proof that we made the right move.
2007-04-13 13:56:15 · answer #3 · answered by Lancaid 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There were weapons of mass destruction. He gassed the Kurds
in the North of Iraq. He used gas in the Iran-Iraq war. But we blew most of them up in 1991. So he did have weapons of mass destruction at one time so it was not a lie.
2007-04-13 18:12:31 · answer #4 · answered by Seth C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Randy Orton is an outstanding heel. basic as that... human beings hate his personality because of what he has been doing as of previous due. Dragon[raw] does make an outstanding element in spite of the truth that. he's taking area in this "sketch personality"-ish villain it truly is no longer quite plausible. And the actual undeniable truth that he hasn't been punished (legally) for what he's "carried out"...makes the storyline that a lot extra far-fetched. So per chance it quite is why some human beings dislike him....or extra, his personality. despite the indisputable fact that it truly is no longer Orton I blame for that. Dragon[raw] did element out something about Randy 'insulting his intelligence', and at the same time as I recognize his opinion; i do not quite consider it. If there is every person responsible for "insulting our intelligence", that could be Vince McMahon and his writers. yet as long as this tale-line maintains, so will this insane personality named Randy Orton!
2016-10-18 01:16:21 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow. Only five answers and already someone has repeated the lie about having found weapons of mass destruction.
2007-04-13 13:50:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
there was wmd's i was in iraq and was in a spec op's RECON unit and was hit with mustard gas and found a bunch of bunkers with the chit in it...not really what we were looking for but it was there and we did get hit so just cause they dont say everything that should be said dosnt mean it didnt happ'n
maybe if you want real answers you should ask real soldiers not the local new's crew. not your fault for not knowing. thank u
2007-04-13 15:22:07 · answer #7 · answered by liquidzac 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who are you going to arrest? Everybody? Most in the US believed it. Including Russia and England and for that matter, most of the free world.
2007-04-13 13:53:30 · answer #8 · answered by sean1201 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Blame the cowardly media. Bush/Rove & Co. trashed and intimidated them. The general public didn't start to get the truth until 2005.
2007-04-13 14:03:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
well not trillions of dollars but there were WMD's not nukes but chemical weapons and sadams initial resistance to UN made him suspisious and the WMD's were gasses and bio weapons that he used to exicute towns of people.
2007-04-13 13:55:50 · answer #10 · answered by Para-diddle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋