sure
gw
2007-04-13 11:18:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by georgewallace78 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
to go AWOL during war time is considered desertion and can be punishable by death. So the question is did he go AWOL or is he a deserter? How long ago did he do this and was the war in Iraq going on ( by witch I meen had the cease fire been declared and the war officially over when he did this). He could still be declared a deserter now due to the police actions and remaining conflict we are having over there and we are still at war with terrorism. I strongly believe that he should turn himself in rather than be turned in. If he turns himself in it would look better on him. I find it hard to believe that he got pulled over and ticketed and nothing came of it without the military stepping in or something coming up about it.
2007-04-13 13:49:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have seen you ask this question several times...
-As an MP in the Guard, I say YES, turn him in.
Out of curiosity, are you doing this to settle a personal score?
Do you know for sure he is at AWOL status?
Was he issued a DD214 where he was discharged under "other than honorable" cirumstances? (You seem to be way up in his business, maybe you can answer that...)
The Military does that to people they don't want anymore.
2007-04-13 11:40:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It seems to me if he was pulled over by the police and he used his real name and wasn't arrested for being AWOL, then he probably isn't. It doesn't appear as if the military is looking for him. Notify the military and let them do what they do. You sound as if your jealous of this guy.
2007-04-16 04:05:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Miki S 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You have asked the same question every day. It is either yes or no. You get both answers and keep asking the same question. So I will go with maybe. Hope this helps.
2007-04-13 11:20:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Face the army.Be a guy and settle for the outcomes of your movements.in case you do no longer you would be finding over your shoulder the the remainder of your existence.some anybody isn't suitable for cover tension existence and that they could take that into attention.As a former Infantry officer,i could get you out for the solid of the army.
2016-12-29 07:58:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
WOW what a good friend you are, NOT why would you ask this Question 5X's and still you ask , WHAT kind of a friend are you , well i think you are just a low life slimey person and you gotta find your self a life for your self , you degenerate low life slime ball. i would hate to get to know you , i hope this aso called friend of yours reads all this and knows who you are , good luke with the rest of your life , with your friends
2007-04-14 12:00:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by jim m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually the AWOL term is still used and yes you should turn him in.
2007-04-13 11:13:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by TilBot1007 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Everything he had done means NOTHING if he doesn't turn himself in. How can he live with himself? Does he s hit himself every time he sees a patrol car? If he doesn't turn himself in, you turn him, in my humble but truthful opinion, he needs to get what he had coming. He made his bed, now he has to lay in it. How can he even look at his family and himself? Doesn't he have a shred of shame in his body?
2007-04-13 11:10:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You ask this question every day and almost everyone says yes you should..
Catch a clue
2007-04-13 11:15:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by h h 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
AWOL isn't used any more. It's old school. Now the term is UA, unauthorized absence.
2007-04-13 11:03:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
0⤊
4⤋