Why did president/the congress try to deny global warming?

Question

why are some people trying to deny global warming? is it because of money? Who else tries to deny global warming?

Answer 1

there is a lot of evidence of man made climate change .and there are many reasons to hide the truth

scientists who work for politicians ,get paid by these politicians and they have downplayed the facts because solutions are expensive and means change and change effects many peoples incomes,and upsets profit margins,so most of the world is kept in the dark of the real things that are going on.for political and economic reasons

Answer 2

They do not forget about worldwide warming, they forget about that the human-triggered carbon-dioxide (CO2), must be the basis of all evil on this case. The earth has continuously been warming up, and cooling down again and again, in jurassic time-interval fx, it was once so much hotter than it's in these days. Even within the medieval instances we had a interval looong interval of hotter local weather. In the 70's all people feared worldwide cooling, and the risk of a brand new ice-age, on account that the graph on worldwide temperature were going tremendously downwards after a interval in which the temperature were growing. Furthermore the temperature has on the grounds that the 12 months 2000 been going downwards once more. I simply believe we have got to receive that those local weather alterations have continuously been occurring, and can hold occurring and on and on without end. People deny that CO2 is the finest sinner of all time, on account that it effectively is towards the human good judgment, when you've got plenty of competencies. Most persons simply consider what they pay attention, while it is any person of top authority pronouncing it, on account that they do not have any history competencies in any respect, rather then "it is a greenhouse gasoline". That mentioned, I'm blissful to peer have this fuzz over us, in order that the scientist and engineers gets on with the progress within the discipline of choice power. Because nomatter the worldwide warming, we are going for walks out of oil and choal, which there is plenty of unhealthy matters to mention approximately rather then the CO2 produced while burning it.

Answer 3

Can you provide one documented example of where either the president or the congress denied global warming? I'll bet neither your nor anyone else can.

Note, to qualify, they must actually deny global warming, not oppose the Kyoto treaty, cap and trade solutions or Al Gore's statetments, or disagree that the current warming trend is man made. They must actually deny that the average global temperatures are increasing

Answer 4

For politicians, the main reason to deny global warming is that fighting global warming will cost their supporters, generally the fossil fuel industry, a lot of money.

For some people, it's because they listen to simplistic arguments ("it's volcanoes") without looking at the data, or because they don't want to face the danger and the changes required, or they just don't like the people saying it's a problem, like Al Gore. Some people see conspiracies in everything.

A few scientists genuinely have different views. Some just like to oppose the general view.

Answer 5

The president was a member of the Harken Energy board of directors, and has close ties with members of the energy industry. So does the VP. There is a lot of money involved.

Answer 6

Unfortunately for all of us...yes it is about money for them . You would think they would want to do something about it considering the FACT that this planet is where THEY have to live too. Also we all need to look at what are we leaving behind for the generations to come after us....they are going to want to kick our a sses. I can't say that I would blame them either.We are killing this planet ...and sucking it dry of all of its resources. Its like in the Matrix when Smith said humans are like parasites....we are like that to the earth. That's f ucked up huh? !!!

Answer 7

No denial . They just don't want to spend the billions of dollars and make us non-competitive with the rest of the world that's paying no attention to it like China and Russia and Brazil ......

Answer 8

The theory of man-made global warming is false, it is based on falsified or incomplete data. Lets take a look at what the global warming crowd claims, they say that the human output of CO2 is causing the greenhouse effect which is warming the planet. To see how outrageous this claim is try to guess how much of our atmosphere is made up of CO2, the correct answer is 0.03% of our atmosphere, almost nothing. How can such a small part of our atmosphere have such an effect on our entire planet, correct answer it can’t. Greenhouse gases exist naturally and have always been in our atmosphere. Greenhouse gases such as CH4 (methane), N2O (Nitrous Oxide), and water vapor are all put out into the atmosphere naturally in far greater concentrations than humans could ever match. Let’s take a look at water vapor, water vapor makes up between 1-4% of the atmosphere far more than CO2. Water vapor is given off into the atmosphere due to evaporation, so evaporation causes much more global warming than humans ever could. Other natural sources such as volcanic eruptions and the decomposition of plant and animal matter also put far more greenhouse gases than humans ever could.
So what is causing global warming? Well first of all the earth may not even be warming. http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/temperature/ This is a collection of global temperatures collected by NASA that shows a general cooling trend especially around the polar ice caps. So assuming the earth is warming what could be causing it, the sun. Look at this graph also put out by NASA: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/17jan_solcon.htm, it shows that the intensity of the sun is directly correlated to global temperatures and recent studies have shown that the sun is now warming than ever before, coincidence? I think not. Also consider that the other planets in our solar system, Mars in particular, are also warming: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
You have to keep in mind that the earth goes through natural cycles of warming and cooling, take for example the ice age and later warming of the earth enough to melt the ice.
Advocates of global warming will try and post evidence but the fact is most evidence for global warming comes in the form of general statements like “think of your children/grandchildren” that try to guilt you into agreeing with them. These ads are devoid of scientific proof and seek to toy with your conscience. Every once in a while you will see a graph submitted as evidence mostly from http://www.ipcc.ch/. Take a look for yourself, I search in vain for proof of global warming on this site, sure there are dozens of graphs showing the same data: CO2 rising along with global temperatures but where are the graphs for other greenhouse gases that make up a greater percentage of our atmosphere and are put out naturally, or graphs showing the percentage of greenhouse gases put out by humans verses the gases put out by natural sources. These graphs are not included because they disprove the theory of man made global warming. The IPCC has had a questionable past, it has published a deliberately falsified graph, the so called hockey stick graph, which left out a period of warming during the 1400’s. This warming period in the 1400’s was more dramatic than what we are seeing today, and it took place long before humans industrialized. This falsification was proven and a reprint of the graph appeared in the journal Nature. You may have seen claims that there is a scientific consensus on global warming like this one: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686, this is an absolute lie, do you need proof? Here http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm the signatures of over 17,000 scientists who disagree with the theory of man made global warming (check out the report on this site it does an excellent job of disproving global warming). You may have also seen reports about ice cores supposedly proving global warming, this is not true. Here is the truth about ice cores http://www.john-daly.com/zjiceco2.htm.
You may have the question why anyone would support this obviously false theory, the answer is money. Average people with no scientific background are being converted to the global warming crowd by the dozens due to the repression of evidence against global warming. This mass of people is the reason why notable people are jumping on the global warming bandwagon. Politicians are supporting global warming for votes, scientists are joining for media time and grants, and CEO’s are pledging their allegiance to gain customers who want to shop where the environment is being supported.
You may also wonder why I care, you may think we can only help the environment if we agree with global warming what’s wrong with that? I want to distinguish between global warming and helping the environment. I have no problem with environmentalist causes, in fact I support them, but global warming is taking this idea to the extreme. If you were to follow the guidelines set forth by people like Al Gore your lifestyle would be, these people want to tell you what light bulbs to use. The main reason however is money, why waste millions on studying global warming when we could be rebuilding third world countries and helping the poor. Global warming is a fear tactic used to get your money and your vote by unscrupulous members of society. Hopefully this will just fade away like the global cooling scare which was brought upon us in the 1970’s by the same sort of people using the same tactics. A last link http://www.worldclimatereport.com/ possibly the best resource for answering many of the questions raised by global warming. I urge anyone who believes in man-made global warming to look into some of the resources I have presented. Do not sacrifice your money, time, vote, and conscience to the greedy members of society who are blinding you to the truth for their own greed.

Answer 9

Yes, money. If you think we can easily and cheaply stop it, you are fooling yourself.