People should take full responsibility on there behaviour towards there team, coz they are the reason the team played for. If public behaves like animals for a only a game or sport then the team should also be not resposible for taking blames for losing a match/series.
2007-04-12 19:19:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i agree, the public has to take responsibility. I'm an Indian, but i do realise that the team will lose sometimes. And overreacting like this will never help them.
I mean, it was pretty clear. Going into the Bangladesh game, you could almost sense the nervousness. Look at Bangladesh, they were under no pressure at all and could play freely, without any inhibition. Same goes for the Sri Lanka game. India was under way too much pressure, and if only the Indian public had some sense knocked into them, they would have perhaps witnessed a much better performance from them. Alas, it was not to be.
2007-04-12 19:17:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by TheSport 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Human nature being what it is, corruption has been an everpresent evil since time immemorial. Judas Iscariot betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver. Let me quote a few stanzas from Edwin Muir's The Castle. Our gates were strong, our walls were thick, So smooth and high, no man could win A foothold there, no clever trick Could take us, have us dead or quick. Only a bird could have got in. What could they offer us for bait? Our captain was brave and we were true.... There was a little private gate, A little wicked wicket gate. The wizened warder let them through. Oh then our maze of tunneled stone Grew thin and treacherous as air. The cause was lost without a groan, The famous citadel overthrown, And all its secret galleries bare. How can this shameful tale be told? I will maintain until my death We could do nothing, being sold; Our only enemy was gold, And we had no arms to fight it with. Corruption has reached the highest level-----The exposure by Agencies may not bear fruit, but I feel at least for some it may act as a deterrent. Out of 100 won't at least one be afraid ? We would have made a beginning in the right direction.
2016-05-19 15:14:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by darlene 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Indian public is the most whimsical of the lot. They adore you like God when you are performing and once that dips they kick you out like a cur. So I feel yes they are upto an extent for this pathetic display of the team. Indian cricket team plays under maximum pressure among all other subcontinent teams and this because of the expectations from them. So I feel the players should be allowed to give their best afterall it is the only the best team that will win.
2007-04-12 20:10:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sobhan Mohanty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
When a cricketer play at this level , there is always pressure from either public or yourself or teammate.This happens with every team.
Indian team have many experienced player and if they fail because of Public pressure or media , then they do not need to play at this level. Public or media should not be responsible. It's just that they could not perform well.
2007-04-13 15:13:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by yup_cool 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Public is doing all for the progress of Cricket. Taking public money as well as Advertisements are not for playing as u like below the parity of Bangladesh.
sk
2007-04-12 19:14:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by SK 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don,t you think that indian players should think about billion of people b4 taking money and playing with their emotions??????????
2007-04-12 18:50:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I fully agree with you.
2007-04-13 09:44:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
agree
2007-04-12 18:40:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes they should.public are the only person .............?
2007-04-12 18:27:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by sanket kumar t 1
·
0⤊
0⤋