It's hilarious to me that a question as poorly asked as this one, get's two stars. Wow, neo-cons, you are REALLY reaching with this one. Whatever floats your boat people. Fear-mongering is your cup of tea, after all.
2007-04-12 18:11:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6
·
4⤊
5⤋
Oh, for Heaven's sake; what hogwash! There are terrorists in this country right now. Iraq is not where they are inducted and trained, and the war in Iraq has nothing to do with terrorists (Except for those who commit terrorist acts there!)
No one, Liberal or otherwise, wants to cater to terrorists! And this is not a "new" problem that needs a "party with a backbone" to deal with it. We have had plenty of our own, home-grown terrorists---racist lynchers, church burners, Federal building bombers, mail bombers, clock tower shooters, etc. etc. How about assassins? Whoever killed JFK, Lincoln, tried to kill Reagan, Sirhan Sirhan, James Earl Ray????? Terrorists all! There will always be some nuts who believe that they must get the attention of others by committing violent acts.
I'm a Liberal and I take a stand: I'm against terrorism! Is that strong enough for you?
2007-04-12 18:54:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joey's Back 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lol. This is such a tired argument. The daisy ad comes to mind. There are so many other things worth the bulk of our time. I'm not saying to ignore terrorism by any means, but come on people. Terrorists are far too disorganized to mount any serious attack. Why dont you start worrying about tuberculosis in china, or the frigging BOMBS there. How about north korea, or now russia. Gimme a break. Try to get your beady eyes past the smoke screen. You can do it. I can smell those two brain cells rubbing together right now.
Unfrozen caveman's response is hilarious. OMG. That mess was funny. *tears*
2007-04-12 18:10:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by joshua 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
What a load of b. s.! You have bought into everything the fear mongering Bush Administration has said, haven't you? Fortunately, most of us here in the U.S. know that such an eventuality is next to impossible as long as our government does their job WITHOUT infringing upon civil liberties. Like Ben Franklin once said, we are not willing to give up one iota of our liberties for the prospect of a bit of safety. Liberty is much more precious than that.
2007-04-12 18:55:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by MathBioMajor 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
well this is the attitude Bush had in 2001,, while vacationing at his ranch in Crawford for the month of August,, Rice had given Cheney the memo,, about Osama bin Laden determined to strike inside The USA,, using our commercial planes to fly them into buildings,,, then they both left for their vacations too,,, by the time they all got back to the White House,, they were to busy to read the memo,, Cheney says he did not get to it until September 10th,,, drats,,, too late,,, over 3,000 people had to die for their incompetence,, after receiving the news that the US was under attack,, Bush sat dumbfound for over 7 minutes before he even got up to speak with the press,,, now there's some backbone for you,,,,,,,, nobody wanted to die,, but Bush and his incompetent cronies were all asleep at the switch,,
on 9-11,, now they have emboldened the terrorists,, because they attacked the wrong country,, bin Laden is roaming free inside Pakistan,, on the Afghanistan border training terrorists,, 6 years later,, more than 3,000 US troops have died,, about 20,000 injured,, they have been in a quagmire in Iraq,,,,so now what,,,, Bush wants to appoint a War Zar,, this way he will have somebody to blame for the fiasco in Iraq,,,
2007-04-12 18:52:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
How, exactly, will those terrorists "come over here" in such numbers that they will "kill us all"?
Which terrorists, exactly, are being catered to?
Can you identify a terrorist when you see one?
Who is the leader of the terrorists?
Where are they, where are their bases, who are they.
Don't be taken in by that nonsense of "fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here"...that is baloney...and is a scare tactic used by Bush to frighten little girls and boys.
2007-04-12 18:49:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I know a party with a strong backbone
the Socialist Party!
and it is not the Liberals who are catering to the terrorists, it is the Neo-Conservitives like Cheney and Wolfiwitz. They are the ones who want a new world order and in order for that to happen, they must have a terrorist group attack us, even if the terrorists are manufactured by the American Government.
2007-04-12 18:08:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hopeless 2
·
3⤊
4⤋
Of course the terrorists will swim right on over and walk down Main Street, U.S.A. They will also go right past all the people watching them, destroy our Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines, and will walk right into the White House and declare this country an Islamic State.
Get real, stop watching the Republicans spinners on TV, and think for yourself once in a while...
2007-04-12 18:07:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5
·
5⤊
5⤋
Or they'll just let them in along with everyother culture to bring the US down! How do you think Rome fell...one of the main reasons is it caved in on itself from too much multiculturalism!
2007-04-12 18:22:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bunz 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
It's hilarious to me that a question as poorly asked as this one, get's two stars. Wow, neo-cons, you are REALLY reaching with this one. Whatever floats your boat people. Fear-mongering is your cup of tea, after all.
and **** no i dont wanna die!
2007-04-12 18:19:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋