If Pakistan had all their players like Shoaib Akhtar, Mohamad Asif and Afraid and then the rest of the team.
2007-04-12 17:29:03 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
I am not pakistani.
Definitely Pakistan far better team then the SriLanka when they are full in number as well as avability of best players like Sohaib Akhtar, like Shoaib Akhtar, Mohamad Asif, Razzak and Afraid.
Potentially this team beat any team in the world no one can stand against it except Aus. I wonder why they not dominate the world they have explosive both batting and bowling.
I think Mohammad Asif will get the throne of the Mcgrath and he deserve to be. He is the only one who ball amusing line an length with swing.This guy hold the future of Pakistan team.
2007-04-12 17:39:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
With all there best players pakistan was beaten by Sri Lanka in the tri series which was held few years back last time they met in pakistan.Then pakistan beat sri lankans in champion trophy in a close game with a wet ball.
Although Afridi is great,I think sri lanka is better with Sanath and Murali.
Pakistan is far better than India with there full side.
2007-04-13 04:25:58 · answer #2 · answered by Shehan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sri Lanka
2007-04-12 17:56:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pakistan may not be playing well these days but every one knows the reasons behind. If you talk about better of the two teams then there is absolutely no comparison between them as Pakistan has some highly talented players both bowlers and batsmen and their record speaks for itself. If they play with their full potential I don't think you will ever need to ask this question.
2007-04-12 22:22:22 · answer #4 · answered by dua 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sri Lanka is a better team as all the players play for the team rather than themselves. Indian and pakistan cricketers play for themselves rather than for the team.
http://www.cricket.indhp.net
2007-04-12 17:48:26 · answer #5 · answered by indhp 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sri Lanka, for sure is the better team and they are not involved in any case of killing there coach or match fixing.
2007-04-12 19:21:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
if pakistan did have there main players i think they could easily take care of Sri Lanka
2007-04-13 02:03:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it has to be the pakis!! with the kind of team they have, they're much much better than the lankans...i noe they didnt perform in the WC, but besides that, they have players which are all match winners...most of u will agree wid me im sure!
inzy, mohd. yousuf, afridi, akhtar, mohd. asif, the list just goes on and on...
ok now, so the pakis are outta d WC, lets talk bout sumthin elz...heard of bigadda.com? check it out cuz its a lotta fun...adios!
2007-04-12 23:35:55 · answer #8 · answered by vishal w 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
by fare pakistan is a better Team if they have all their players.
if pakistan gets all their players they will be able to beat any team in the world. and i heard something about killing and other stuff, Bobs killing had nothing to do with pak. team.
2007-04-12 19:30:12 · answer #9 · answered by Mike M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are equally good teams. However, if Pakistan are in their full strength, they will be the stronger team.
2007-04-12 17:35:59 · answer #10 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋