English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is he right and is he eyeing for the Chairmenship of BCCI can we expect good improvement under his tenure as he has done for railway and bonus for AM ADMI

2007-04-12 16:10:10 · 11 answers · asked by padminiramesh@yahoo.com 3 in Sports Cricket

11 answers

It is not important which state dominates cricket or BCCI, we want good results, the best in the world. Maybe, we can give lalu a try, but with the warning that he would be punished if he fails, the overenthusiastic fans may burn his house and his effigy, and finish his political career, if he agrees to these conditions, let him give it a try.

2007-04-12 17:54:54 · answer #1 · answered by wizard of the East 7 · 0 0

Yes,
Maharastra and Karnataka always dominate BCCI and the Indian cricket team. I am not sure about Bengal.

Out of the 14 member team for the world cup, see how many players from these two regions: Dravid, Sachin, Kumble, Uthappa, Agarkar that is 5 / 14 which is almost 35% of the team.

Even in the past these two regions have dominated.

We should also select players from Kashmir, Meghalaya, Tripura, Tamilnadu also;

2007-04-13 00:41:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

Yes!
The BCCI is definitely dominated by Maharashtra. No doubt about it!
Why not Lalu..?? Lalu who has made the railways a profitable one can even make team India succeed.

2007-04-13 13:44:01 · answer #3 · answered by Sanjana S 1 · 0 0

yes i agree with him that the states of mah ,kar do dominate the bcci
not much sure abt bengal but bengal dominate the east region
for eg:ashis nehra ,even on being the best bowler for india in the asia cup in srilanka was dropped for his poor fielding,ignoring the fact that he was performing but agarkar who used to b the most expensive bowler was repeatedly given chances

as for bengal in the deodhar trophy team for east zone,8-9 players were always in the playing 11,players like BS Pati of Orissa and J Arun Kumar of assam(both specialist openers) even on performing werent given a chance instead the openers of bengal S.Das & A.das who had a miserable ranji outing prior were given chance even after failing repeatedly

so i do conclude lalu has made correct observations

2007-04-13 02:21:38 · answer #4 · answered by ♫♥♪siddharth ♫♥♪ 3 · 0 0

obviously these r the states that have produced the best cricketers for india!!
lalu wants to put his foot in too many boats at the same time!!
he is lured by the money involved in BCCI!!

2007-04-13 01:30:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I dont think one should give importance to the words of people who don't even know abc of the game. As i m a bihari i know his intentions. He is a very mean person and to wud go to any extent for his benefit. Actualy he has a son playing cricket from bihar ranji team. He wants him to play for india. Thats why he is making such comments.

2007-04-13 00:53:18 · answer #6 · answered by Amit Kumar 1 · 0 0

I totally disagree with the above statement. I am surprised how people talk about regionalism in the sports, which is spoiling the games in India as every region insists for quota afor their region irrespective of whether have got talented players or not.

2007-04-12 23:44:31 · answer #7 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

k, dont take it in a bad way,
but lalu doesn't know anything about cricket.
he just wanna be in the news and media...

ignore his comments, let him drink some bhang... lol
i mean pepsi!

2007-04-12 23:54:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think he only knew people who r frm those states.hedoes'nt know anything n his voices r to b ignored.don't worry.

2007-04-13 02:23:22 · answer #9 · answered by rinu n 2 · 0 0

dont agree with it

2007-04-13 01:44:12 · answer #10 · answered by john 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers