loss of structural integrity replaced into possibly a results of weakening brought about by using fires on the 5th to seventh flooring. The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they brought about the development to interrupt down stay unknown today. even with the certainty that the entire diesel gasoline on the premises contained super ability ability, the best hypothesis has purely a low threat of prevalence. extra examine, examine, and analyzes are mandatory to be sure this concern. [Ch. 5, p. 31.] even with FEMA's preliminary looking that fireplace brought about the give way, conspiracy theorists have self assurance the give way replaced into the end results of a controlled demolition, a theory regularly observed by using different 9/11 conspiracy theories. while asked approximately controlled demolition theories, Dr. Sunder reported, "We consulted 80 public-sector professionals and a hundred twenty five inner maximum-sector professionals. that's a Who’s Who of professionals. human beings seek for different recommendations. As scientists, we are able to’t concern approximately that. information are information."[11] In answer to the question of even if if "a controlled[-]demolition hypothesis is being seen to describe the give way", NIST reported that, "[w]hile NIST has discovered no information of a blast or controlled demolition adventure, it would choose to be sure the magnitude of hypothetical blast eventualities that could have introduced approximately the structural failure of one or extra extreme components."[7]
2016-10-22 00:31:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No more than anyone can prove that the unofficial 9/11 stories have true credibility.
2007-04-12 14:56:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
That depends on what you mean by "prove". There are countless experts, studies, books and websites that present the truth.
But to a true believer "Conspiracy Theorist", that means nothing. They dismiss anything that disagree's with their "theory" as being part of the "conspiracy".
If you are asking a legitimate question, here are some sources for you. If you are seeking to legitimize your own "conspiracy fantasy", I guess you will have to look elsewhere.
2007-04-12 14:59:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
The proof you seek is self evident for numerous reasons, least of which is , despite some of their impressive credentials, not one contradictory valid or verifiable fact has been published in a scientific venue that can be reviewed by their peers - only on op-blogs, web sites and fictional "documentaries."
The official bipartisan report stands on its own - the burden of proof lies with those who dispute it, and in over 5 years, not one single shred of valid or verifiable proof to the contrary has surfaced. Period.
2007-04-12 15:27:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
It doesn't matter is the "official" story is true or not. The way the tragedy of 9/11 was used by right-wingers is the same way that the Reichstag Fire was used by the Nazis...
Reichstag Fire Decree = Patriot Act.
2007-04-12 14:58:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Julian X 5
·
3⤊
4⤋
We were at a party
His ear lobe fell in the deep
Someone reached in and grabbed it
It was a rock lobster
We were at the beach
Everybody had matching towels
Somebody went under a dock
And there they saw a rock
It wasn't a rock
It was a rock lobster
2007-04-12 14:56:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by tabs 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
My pet goat is the official story
2007-04-12 14:57:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
how can anyone prove a lie? It's impossible, unless they are proving that it is a lie.
2007-04-13 16:07:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by peace 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
99.99 percent of the proof is directed at the official story yet conspirators dismiss that proof outright and actually mock those that refuse to look at their socalled .01 percent "proof" even though they are ironically dismissing much much more proof.
Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
2007-04-12 14:56:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by cadisneygirl 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
the "official 911" story is absurd...
2007-04-12 15:12:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋