English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

He doesn't HAVE an Iraq war policy. Oh, you mean sending people to fight with NO goal or strategy? He just plans to keep sending people to die until we run out. That sleazy, baby-kiling, immoral, wicked, flagitious, gutless, nutless, idiotic, blood-lusting, Hitlerite, incompetent, corrupt, mutant, spastic should be impeached and hanged for treason!

2007-04-12 12:04:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I support trying to end international terrorism. I support liberating Iraq.

Probably we should fight HARDER in Iraq. Maybe have 300,000 troops, or 500,000 troops. Did you know there are 1.3 million men and women in the armed forces? Let's utilize them!

Bush has said all along that it will be costly and lengthy. But people forget. Lots of people are pretty wimpy about it. Lots of people have forgotten September 11. And lots of people think September 11 was the only terrorist attack. Lots of people have their head in the sand. Lots of people blindly hate the president. Lots of people feel irrational guilt, want to sympathize with the terrorists, want to make the terrorists feel better. And lots of people crow and whine and cry and bleat on worldwide forums like Yahoo Answers, hurting the war on terror, while not knowing what they're talking about.

2007-04-12 19:06:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No,,, Bush is losing his war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan

2007-04-12 19:03:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

No. We're mired in a mess and Bush is too stone headed to look at any strategy that involves pulling out of that hell hole.
One thing that scares me is that we're building permanent bases there now and no one even talks about that.

2007-04-12 19:08:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

i did right, from the beginning. my problem we waited for the French 90 days delay. in hind site wmd could have been moved. i wish he planted wmd materials to justify the war.. but he didn't.
i also believe another reason . he thought , they would have bases in Iraq. to keep Iran in check..
we were promise help from the Germans and the French.
never happen.

2007-04-12 19:28:10 · answer #5 · answered by MR TADS 4 · 1 1

Supporting the troops only gets them killed for no reason. the only people that want the war are professional killers and bush lovers, one in the same.

2007-04-12 19:02:18 · answer #6 · answered by warning 2 · 1 2

Nope. Never have, never will. We're there because of faulty intelligence and there's no excuse for the US to be fighting this war. It's a civil war, even mr. bush said so.

2007-04-12 18:59:16 · answer #7 · answered by katydid 7 · 2 3

No. If you're going to fight a war, you should declare it, and fight to win, not work towards perpetual stalemate.
This isn't some military-industrial gravytrain like the Cold War.

2007-04-12 19:03:18 · answer #8 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0 2

His policy to lie about the need to invade a sovereign nation not hurting us and allow to escape from our soldier in Afghanistan the real enemy, to allow the destruction of humanity's antiquities, to torture to death in Saddam's prisons dozens of people our own military said are guilty of nothing, to commit war crimes and mass murder against tens of thousands of innocent iraqis, and to loot billions of our money and give it to his friends.

That policy? Gee, I'll need to ponder further and see what I think of it.

2007-04-12 19:00:32 · answer #9 · answered by cassandra 6 · 2 2

No, no, a thousand times no. It is a failed policy as it was from the begining, is now, and ever shall be.

2007-04-12 19:02:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers