1.Dennis Kucinich
2.Hillary Clinton
3.John Edwards
4.Barack Hussein Obama
My money is on Kucinich since he would surrender to a girl scout if she took a swing at him,luckily he has zero chance of ever being President,even if he raised a billion dollars to run his campaign.
2007-04-12 11:41:50 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey chi guy,if you want to crack on Romney it might help to learn to spell his name first!
2007-04-12 11:48:41 · update #1
1. Kucinich
2. The "Breck Girl", John Edwards
3. Osama Obama
4. Clinton
Kucinich was the first Democrat to surrender to terrorists and then started to support them.
Sure, Hillary is a communist. But she's not as communist as Klucinichk, Obama, or shyster lawyer, John Edwards.
Go Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-04-12 11:48:23 · answer #1 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
What surrender? Surrender what? The continuing presence of U.S. forces and corporate power enflames those across the civil war divide, as well as the greater Islamic community in the region, and a withdrawal of both of these elements is a necessary (though not sufficient) condition for bringing the Iraqi communities together.
This should not be seen as a 'defeat' for the U.S., but as a move to have the U.S. play an entirely different and positive role in the world. The “get the jump on others before they get the jump on you” approach to world or even domestic problems is as outdated as parachute pants and the gas guzzlers of the 1990s.
.
2007-04-12 11:47:38 · answer #2 · answered by twowords 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Pelosi's already got the head scarf thing down, but she's not running... at least she hasn't claimed all the executive powers just yet.
So, I'm going with Kucinich. Anyone bad enough to almost get recalled as mayor of Cleveland brings worry to me from the start.
2007-04-12 12:16:55 · answer #3 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Can't say which of the other three would make it to the white flag first, but Clinton doesn't strike me as the surrendering type.
For one thing, she's too good at spin. It wouldn't be a surrender, it'd be a phased redeployment to better protect American interests in the broader region.
2007-04-12 11:48:34 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Hey, great question - I've got another great question - which President would propose that our ports be managed by Dubai, the same folks who harbor militant extremists who hate America ... ? I'll give ya 3 guesses, and here's a clue ... his name begins with GWB.
2007-04-12 11:50:49 · answer #5 · answered by Frank J 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's hard to say.Obama I think is already there, Hillary if she thought it would make her popular and it would amongst her own and John Edwards would cower in a corner. I'm not sure about Kucinich cause I haven't heard of him yet. But you are probably right!
2007-04-12 11:47:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
It's a toss up between Edwards and Obama because they are so adamant about pulling out, naively.
Alright. I decided Obama would surrender first, but WE should hand over Edwards to get him out of our hair.
2007-04-12 11:54:41 · answer #7 · answered by Lana Lang 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i might positioned my money on whichever one acted like Bush. because he caved in and launched the money the US replaced into preserving against North Korea, so as that they might supposedly pay for shutting down nuclear enrichment, i might say all of us who could fall for that shell interest is a coward.
2016-10-22 00:06:24 · answer #8 · answered by schwalm 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good thing Pelosi is not on that list, she's already flying over there to personally deliver our white flag :X
2007-04-12 11:55:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
barack oboma, then hilary then dennis, I'll be voting for edwards if he makes the ballot, otherwise it will be a republican.
2007-04-12 14:40:51 · answer #10 · answered by the d 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋