Germany=Adlof Hitler, i think we all know why
Italy= benito mussolini, fascist pig
U SAID ANY COUNTRY
2007-04-12 10:13:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jose G 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pinochet, Saddam Hussein, Mugabe
All genocidal regimes (Turkish genocide against the Armenians, Rwandan genocide, East Timor - the list goes on)
All the leaders of the Apartheid regime in South Africa
Most of the autocratic crowned heads of Europe throughout history.
Leopold II of Belgium (saw a documentary last night on what his regime did in the Belgian Congo - absolutely appalling)
The reasons are similar for all - causing wars, genocide, persecution of those who disagreed with them or those who they scapegoated, racism, government through fear, dehumanisation of people considered different for one reason or another, sundry other atrocities (in Leopold II's case committing countless atrocities against an entire population and literally working half of them to death, purely for profit and personal gain).
There are probably quite a few I've forgotten, but you get the idea. The faults and mistakes of our democratically elected governments pale into insignificance by comparison.
2007-04-12 23:37:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spacephantom 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe must be a leading contender. He is useless at managing the economy. and has an awful human rights record. He turned an agricultural superpower into a wasteland, hyperinflation (exacerbated by his policy of printing as much money as he needed) caused his currency to collapse and he is trying to extend his electoral term at the age of 80 something. Makes Saddam Hussein look like Marcus Aurelius.
2007-04-12 11:22:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Robert Mugabe
2007-04-12 10:13:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Confuzzled 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Vichy Nazi Government of Southern France and North Africa 1940+ - total crap, sold their own people to the Nazis for money, as though slaves. Think the leader's name was Marshall Petain - he became a hate figure.
2007-04-14 02:21:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you won't like Obama, and mutually as I disagree with you there, I appreciate your opinion and could p.c. to disagree with it in peace. in spite of the undeniable fact that, in case you think of Obama is the worst chief ever, you have no longer study a superb form of history! Chairman Mao permit thousands and thousands of his countrymen starve to dying in the failed super bounce forward application. Stalin murdered inner maximum landowners and decreased the the remainder of the inhabitants to digital slave hard artwork Hitler corrupted the subculture of his complete u . s . and murdered 14 million harmless human beings in the worst manners conceivable Vlad the Impaler massacred his very own human beings and displayed their corpses on outdoor stakes Andrew Jackson carelessly slaughtered interior of reach individuals and compelled them from their homelands Hoover started the super melancholy Caligula lived an entire life of debauchery adequate to be a sketch And this would not start to conceal the long record of usurpers and murderers for the era of history. Now, evaluate all of this. And now evaluate Obama, who began his presidency extremely at present. a superb form of the themes he's dealing with are outfitted up from the failures of the Bush administration, coupled with an increasing partisanship in Congress which has rendered it almost ineffective. Does Obama look so undesirable? See, a minimum of under Obama, you could whinge approximately him the way you're on the instant. yet whilst this develop into Stalin's u.s.? BAM! you're a dull guy, your place could be burned, and God help your loved ones, by fact the intense-score officers have an eye fixed on them. yet, of course, you will probable reject this for a reaction that sure "YEH! Obama is teh Muslim Kenyan Commie antichrist." properly, you're entitled on your opinion. in simple terms be grateful you reside in a rustic that facilitates you to voice it.
2016-12-29 05:21:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton? Wow, that's a biased opinion.
Bush has got every president beat that I've experienced and I remember LBJ.
I served under Regan and I thought he was bad cutting our pay and asking people to retire, while acting like he was pro Armed Service.
But Bush, look who he's put in harms way for no reason.
Even if Nixon was corrupt, he eventually stopped a war.
2007-04-12 10:19:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by ScooterLibby 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Blair. Bush. Can be used to spell Rubbish
2007-04-12 10:24:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Here are some candidates:
Hitler - 11 million victims.
Stalin - 3 million +
Pol Pot - 1.4 million
2007-04-12 10:29:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
hitler-reason..mass extermination
stalin-reason..hitlers cohort
mussolini-reason..hitlers cohort
idi amin-reason..genocide
robert mugabe-reason..genocide
pol pot-reason..genocide
saddam hussein-reason..mass murder
the above four leaders murdered their own countryfolk in the name of power/lust-so maybe bush aint so bad after all-but he's bad enough!!.
2007-04-12 10:20:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by tony c 5
·
1⤊
0⤋