You get to Heaven and can be seated at a table with one author u choose Kerouac, Vonnegut or Hunter Thompson?

Question

and Why?

Answer 1

Hello

I would choose to seat at Kerouac's table, because first of all I never liked Hunter Thompson, he was never a a true journalist, he made lies into news and made people to believe in lies. I wouldn't seat next to Vonnegut because never liked him. I would prefer to seat next to Kerouac, I think he is one of great writer of all time, also I would ask him if he was bisexuality or no.

Answer 2

Kurt Vonnegut. Kerouac died of alcoholism when he was 47 years old. Hunter Thompson shot himself in the head. Vonnegut at least made it to the end at 84 years old. He also had a tough life. He had four natural children, and adopted three family children, because their parents died early in life. Plus Vonnegut is funny intellectually, while Thompson was funny rebelliously, and Kerouac was hip funny. And Vonnegut saw the horrors of war, having served in WWII and was captured at the Battle of the Bulge. That's real life experience unmatched by anything else.

Answer 3

Now here is the twist, love Vonnegut as a writer but I think Hunter Thompson would make a more interesting table mate.

Answer 4

Who wouldn't choose Vonnegut?

Although I don't know much about the other two, I do know that I'm fascintated with Kurt Vonnegut's life. He lived during (and fought in) WWII, and unlike most authors of that time and of the cold war era that followed, he had a really ironic and darkly humorous outlook on life. His way of describing things is so great, and I feel like he'd be the most interesting person to talk to.

Answer 5

Vonnegut bescause he is better in my humble opinion then them.

Answer 6

Those are my only choices?

I'd flip them all off and go get a muffin. Search out Dante or maybe Rumi.